this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
23 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32075 readers
815 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fubo@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Reminder: As the aggressor in an imperialist colonialist war, Russia can end the war at any time, just by returning all its troops to its own territory. The continuation of the war is purely the choice of the extreme right-wing Russian dictator and his cronies, who continue to violently exploit the Russian people.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Exactly. If this were remotely true, it would have been cheaper to just buy the old weapon systems from Ukraine.

[–] TomHardy@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Not really, as you argue without respect to the core of the problem, that is, the US is building a geopolitical tool next to Russia's borders (obviously against Russia). Even if Putin suddenly disappears, another politician will get support from Russia's elite and probably easy consent from the Russian public to pursue an anti-NATO foreign policy.

Nothing will change until the US will change it's foreign policy towards Russia and stop meddling with countries bordering with Russia.

Also this does not contradict that Russia is not an oligarchy or Putin is not a dictator, before you call me pro-Putin. Russia can be the aggressor, an "extreme right-wing dictator ship" that attacked Ukraine and at the same time Ukraine was set up like a red flag in front of a bull by the West.

Remember, there is no reason a country like Russia should perceive the US and its vassal states as friendly. They have no way to assume whatever they do with Ukraine or try to do with Belarus is not against them. In fact, the opposite is true, the foreign policy of the US writes that Russia is their enemy and they will allocate so and so much funds to fight it. You think you need to be a right-wing dictator or an ex-KGB agent to grasp that the goal of the west is to subdue your political class or to turn your country into a gas colony for them?

But of course, being a biased lib that thinks the world is built like Lord of the Rings or a comic book, what's class consciousness to you? You believe that there are ebil people like Putin, that suddenly went crazy and decided to invade Ukraine for no reason than being evil.

Don't you think if the Russian capitalists are investing so much money into the war because they see Ukraine as a pawn of the US and as a threat? And they will continue fund it if it stays a threat to them, beyond Putin? Nah, they put in billions for the lolz. Because Putin said so.

[–] lightrush@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even if you believe all of this, it should be obvious that the invasion was an abject failure in contributing towards these goals. There's more NATO equipment and support around that border now than ever before. Staying, expending more of your people's lives, public and private capital looks like a really counterproductive thing to do. It's only making those goals harder to meet longer term.

[–] TomHardy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Even if

What do you mean by even if? Where did I say "therefore the invasion of Ukraine cannot be a failure" or "therefore Russia's capitalist government will do the best for their people in the long term"? Again, what's up with all this X and Y cannot be true at the same time.

I mean, who are the winners in a Cold War at all? You say there is a NATO border incoming. Is this a win for the world population, to be closer to a nuclear war? When two blocks of oligarchies exchange punches, I would say one misses the point when they cheer on the blue-yellow one.

[–] coffeekomrade@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Could easily argue that the winner of the Cold War was the US, considering the USSR collapsed through internal strife and balkanization.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] lightrush@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What do you mean by even if? Where did I say "therefore the invasion of Ukraine cannot be a failure" or "therefore Russia's capitalist government will do the best for their people in the long term"? Again, what's up with all this X and Y cannot be true at the same time.

Got it.

You say there is a NATO border incoming. Is this a win for the world population, to be closer to a nuclear war? When two blocks of oligarchies exchange punches, I would say one misses the point when they cheer on the blue-yellow one.

For the world population, maybe. There's an argument to be made that a weaker militarily and economically Russia is less likely to decide to throw punches and the punches would be weaker. That might be good for the rest of us people of the world. I simply can't see any stability emerging from the status quo in Russia in the medium term and so I see it as needing mitigation. The economic development didn't manage to put enough money and control in the hands of average Russians who could tame punch throwing impulses. 😐 The average Russians will be paying either way.

There's a lot of maybes and mights in there. That's just my view. That said, a whole lot of Europe was a lot more positively inclined towards Russia before the war.

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bro Russia would easily be the wealthiest country in Europe if they weren't obsessed with being global antagonists. Lmao, they literally say that cringe shit out loud every time they talk about "Anglo Saxons" on Russian media. They know their entire schtick is fucking them over, yet they still do it.

[–] lightrush@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And if the ruling class didn't keep obscene amounts of wealth from reaching the average Russian.

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I feel like you want to have this argument with someone and, sure, go for it, but I feel like you're painting OP as the average /r/worldnews poster, and that's a very rude thing to do. For all I know they might agree with you but the hostility isn't helping.

Sorry if this is a little forward or "tone policing", it just bugged me.

[–] TomHardy@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What in OP's comment did not seem like reddit r/worldnews level to you? And no, I don't expect to get a reply nor a discussion with OP, it just appears to me that the top comments are usually simple one-liners, so I thought I elaborate this time on an alternative view and mock their (possible) world view that they put out as some common fact

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What in OP’s comment did not seem like reddit r/worldnews level to you?

For starters, they recognized russian people also as exploited victims of the ruling class. Instead of the usual comparing them to orcs or whatever.

I don't think it's productive to argue with a version of someone you came up with. There's a way to make a point about US foreign policy and capital's role in the war without mocking people.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Spzi@lemmy.click 16 points 1 year ago (5 children)

"And, as Putin said yesterday, one of the tasks was to demilitarise Ukraine. In fact, this task is largely completed. Ukraine is using less and less of its weapons. And more and more it uses the weapons systems that Western countries supply it with."

Ah, the subtle differences between demilitarization and upgrading to NATO standards.

If his statement had ever anything to do with reality. Probably just feel-good words directed at the domestic audience.

[–] zkikiz@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Mission failed successfully! We bombed a lot of "Nazis" and their local weapons capabilities! Pay no attention to the fact that we've radicalized an entire generation of brand-new nationalists, strengthened our enemies, and ensured free flow of cutting-edge weaponry into their country while feeding an entire generation of our young men into a meat grinder.

[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

is Putin trying out a new comedy routine? Because I legit laughed when I read that quote.

[–] TrollerXD@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

i suppose he thinks ukraine relying on western nations for weaponry is better than ukraine being able to produce its own (im fairly sure that they still are producing their own so.)

[–] kartonrealista@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can the cowards downvoting the comment I'm responding to and others in this thread respond to this comment? I want to block you guys but you timidly refuse to stick your head out and post your disagreements out in the open.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] petrescatraian@libranet.de 4 points 1 year ago

@Spzi Ukraine has been demilitarized of soviet equipment FWIW. Imagine how long it would've taken Ukraine to do this had it not been an invasion on its land. Thanks, Putler!

Bonus: Putler has also demilitarized former Warsaw Pact members of Soviet weaponry even further. Can you believe the benefits of it? I'm in tears of joy rn.

@njaard

[–] BurntPunk@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

dying on the ground riddled with bullets haha! You see, I have successfully disarmed my opponent, as they are now entirely out of ammo. Mission accomplished!

[–] neoman4426@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"We have purposely trained him wrong, as a joke"

[–] EisFrei@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

"How do you like my nuts to your first style?"

[–] frevaljee@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I'm bleeding, making me the victor

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!

[–] Jackofmany@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Keeping their options open for an exit strategy. Must be for their domestic consumption

[–] cowvin@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is pretty pathetic for positive spin. It reminds me of Zap Brannigan: "You see, Killbots have a preset kill limit. Knowing their weakness, I sent wave after wave of my own men at them, until they reached their limit and shutdown. Kif, show them the medal I won."

[–] kronarbob@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

This was exactly my though !! That and at the beginning of the war, when russian soldiers didn't know they went to war, I saw Brannigan saying :

"Surprise is the key of victory !! Surprise !! drop the soldiers on the battlefield

[–] N00dle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Russia just wants time to restock their ammo and do this again 5-10 years. They're are increasing artillery production, still building misses, and Shahed drone factory. They don't want peace they will keep attacking till they get pushed all the way back. The only purpose that drone factory serves is to continue attacking civilians even if a peace deal is formed.

[–] lmaydev@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago

Off you fuck then!

[–] PlasmaK@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago
[–] theory@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] njaard@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

No, the Kremlin is sometimes able to say things, that, uh, may conflict with reality.

[–] Mirodir@lemmy.fmhy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tbf, if they lie to their people about the "special military operation" being a success and fuck off out of Ukraine, that would already be a massive improvement over the status quo.

[–] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Seriously, Putin. You're a dictator with a massive propaganda network. Just declare victory and march home, before you continue to get your butts kicked

[–] theory@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago
[–] MxM111@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

"Alternative facts"

[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

Нет! Это правда! It says it right in the name!

(/s obviously)

[–] MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Can you turn me into a sun next?

[–] Borg286@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Did anyone else notice that this is the Kremlin saying this rather than Pootin? Is the Kremlin getting ready to tell poopypants-poopin to sit in the corner? This might be a shift in leadership.

[–] njaard@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is probably an example of Synecdoche, where "Kremlin" means "officials of the government".

[–] Evono@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Doubt for a leader like poopy pants theres only 1 way out.

[–] UnkTheUnk@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago

Ya hear that Lloyd Austin? Time for another 20 billion

load more comments
view more: next ›