this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
15 points (94.1% liked)

Asklemmy

43757 readers
1209 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not willing to give them ideas so fast.

That's something that popped in my head as soon as I started in here, not so long ago.

But there's nothing to prevent that, right? I mean, Meta could very well create a meta instance on Lemmy or Kbin or Mastodon or in all of them, bring a bunch of users, sprinkle in some ads because why not.

Sure, they could be defederated from more restrictive insfances. In the bigger picture, every other instance could boycott them, but they would surely federate among themselves (Elon meets Mark, ugh). They also have all the computational power and would have no problem being the largest instances in the Fediverse.

Then what? Is that feasible? Probable? My utopian future about a free, descentralized Fediverse is a lie?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] corytheboyd@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

If it makes money, they will come.

With social sites, money comes from ads, and ads work better served to tons of people. So, if they see millions of people active (anywhere on the internet, not just fediverse), some marketing piece of shit will deem it an “untapped market” and it will begin.

Thing is though, servers are not run by corporations (they could be, of course), so maybe it will be different. But be honest, if you ran a very popular server for free, and someone offered you $2M a year to run some ads… you’re doing it. This is inevitable given growth.

Maybe everyone will be comfortable with server hopping anyway and it won’t be like it is with Reddit. Idk just having fun for now, actually posting on something for the first time in years because it’s small enough that real people actually talk back hah, riding that as long as I can

[–] fastfinge@rblind.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So when I read that, I thought you meant instances owned by corporations. I think it'd be pretty nice to go to lemmy.microsoft.com and they'd have groups for all the Microsoft products where users could get support, learn about updates, etc. And you'd know it was an official community because it was hosted by Microsoft. But you could federate, and wouldn't have to make a forum account for every single company you wanted to interact with. I'm imagining lemmy.apple.com, lemmy.microsoft.com, lemmy.sonos.com, lemmy.linksys.com, whatever. I'd like that.

[–] ppptan@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Right. With federation, it's only an addition to the network, not supplanting it.

[–] _s10e@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

That would be a good thing. More instances are good. More users are good.

If meta federates with Lemmy and mastodon, we could interact with our grandparents again.

[–] MedicareForSome@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We do it’s called ‘beehaw’

[–] shaggy959500@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] RomanRoy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please, let's not popularize the "/s" here

[–] CMLVI@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I already got vote massacred cause I made a joke about displaying Nazi logos being illegal, since that neighborhood in...Chicago? outlawed the trans flag(where I was clearly on the right side) and people assumed I was making an actual, factual argument for the nazis. It's necessary sometimes lol

[–] JustJack23 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am new here and out of the loop. Can you explain?

[–] JohannesOliver@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Beehaw defederated from some of the larger Lemmy instances due to problem users and limited moderation abilities (Lemmy as a platform, limited staff). As one of the larger Lemmy instances themselves and where many Reddit folks went, this rubbed some people the wrong way. Beehaw has a specific idea about the community they want and are proactive in protecting that vision, I don’t know how this makes them “corporate” but there you go.

[–] JustJack23 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you :)

[–] planish@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

We probably want all instances of substantial size to run under incorporated legal entities, because then there's a legal entity that can collect the donation money, be cooperatively owned, have a DMCA registered agent, get registered as a nonprofit, and so on. We don't want instance operators personally owing Nintendo a jillion dollars when they try and come for the Zelda memes or whatever.

I don't think the important line here is individual vs. legal fiction, it's whose interests (users vs. owners) the instance is set up to serve.

[–] MaxTepafray@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Treat federation like email. Gmail didn't ruin email.

[–] LostCause@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most certainly if this grows big enough corporations will join in if only to market whatever products to the userbase.

What you can do is to work on supporting/curating instances which don‘t want this. Try to see what kind of people are in charge and what their reaction would be. For example I‘m also on an instance (http://lemmy.dbzer0.com/) created by a r/piracy mod who I‘m fairly certain wouldn‘t federate with corporations or let his instance be controlled by them.

Lemmy.ml which I‘m also on, probably not positive with US companies, but might federate with Chinese companies.

What makes all this not a big concern for me is how easy it is for me to drop an instance and go to another one, but I‘m also not attached to my users in general, hopefully we can get some export/import functions for cases where we need to abandon somewhere (unless it exists and I haven‘t seen it yet?).

[–] deaconblue@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am just learning my way around in the Fediverse but from what I currently understand I agree with you about being able to go elsewhere if you don't get along with some new neighbors. I do believe that if this thing gets as big as we all hope it does then the financial resources to scale it up have to come from somewhere. Whether that's a commercial enterprise backing it for potential financial gain, or a loosely connected group of donors, at least in the west and for sure in the US, whoever puts up the money is going to want to call the shots.

[–] LostCause@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The way I see the federation system is it‘s basically like little states, except they are based on voluntary association.

So imagine for example if a bunch of people decided: I don‘t like how this country is run and so they are immediately teleported to the country of their choice and other than losing post history (which I hope can be fixed) there is no negative like IRL (it being expensive and purposefully hard to do).

Shitty countries that don‘t provide for their citizens would start to fall behind and fail. In a way this is happening with migration and one can hope also in business (those whining that nobody wants to work are a prime example), it‘s just the states who stop people and try to keep them captive to labor and fight and pay taxes etc.

Now in the fediverse on the other hand, it’s as easy as making an account, so if my state turns into a corporate bureaucracy I will pack my bags and leave. Plus with some tech knowhow, if I don‘t like any of the states I‘m making my own. So yeah, I‘m excited and I hope it grows!

[–] KrimsonBun@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

We can always defederate and block corporate instances

[–] Ungoliantsspawn@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly is not a big deal. Some specific instance might start behaving like aholes because of corporate greed or anything else.

All they can do is take their specific communities down. The affected communities can always move to other instance (that is easier than changing to a different system all together).

Changing platforms will always be harder than just switch instance because you instance changed the rules on you.

[–] _finger_@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The word “millions of eyes” tends to start attracting corporate overlords. When we hit a million users I think things might start changing.

[–] asjmcguire@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I'm basically all for it. The Fediverse is supposed to be an inclusive place, for everyone. Then we all get to decide if we don't want to hear from someone and can block them from our instance, or even block an entire instance. It wouldn't be terribly inclusive though if we started dictating who could and could not be part of the Fediverse.

[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why not? With the structure of the Fediverse, it's impossible for anyone to lock their users to their particular instance, and if their users prove to be problematic, they'll just get defederated.

[–] utopianfiat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

And if someone can run an instance like a business and still federate, more power to them. Labor should be paid.

[–] Wit@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If I can still access all of that content from kbin or lemmy, what's the problem? I get their content, but they can't serve me ads, change kbin's feed algorithm, or have control over anything outside their one instance.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cambionn@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

Meta is making a Mastodon-compatible Twitter-replacement app. The Beta is already done with sone populair influences and it's supposed to go live sometimes soon afaik.

Otherwise, Mozilla has a Mastodon instance. Depending on how commercial/big you need to be to count as a "corperate instance" to you, there are a few more.

[–] MoreIronOre@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Ultimately, that is down to user behaviour.

[–] Kichae@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Meta's got a microblogging thing coming, and it's supposed to be coming soon. Tumblr has ActivityPub support on their roadmap.

It's coming. There will be issues with it, possibly around advertising, definitely around spam and moderation.

Many big instances will become small overnight, and will likely federated with corporate sites. Many small instances will suddenly be tiny in comparison and not federated with them.

[–] cralder@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tumblr has already said they are doing something with the fediverse but I'm not sure if that panned out or not as I have not kept up with the news on that.

But really, why would that be a bad thing for the users on the smaller instances? If you use Lemmy or kbin or mastodon or whatever for an instance you trust you could interact with users on corporate instances without having to sell your soul to Zuck. I personally don't see it a a bad thing.

[–] RomanRoy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The ads! Just wait for the ads!

[–] utopianfiat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Who cares? If it helps the instance sustain itself long term, then they should get those dollars

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheGayDude@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

As long as the ads are limited to sponsor posts and banner ads I really wont mind, you can just scroll past them

[–] Otome-chan@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Didn't meta announce they were gonna make a fediverse thing?

[–] MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Let em do it.. with how this whole thing works, it's not like they'll hold any type of power or sway with in the feddiverse. We will just have more options as far as content, and the ability to come together to defederate, or just block on your end.

[–] Kaldo@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Would that even be a bad thing? Businesses like news outlets, media companies, game companies, content creators all have a presence on reddit, twitter and similar social networks. Having them first-hand in the fediverse would be a good thing, especially if they host their own instances, it would further legitimize the fediverse and expand it.

[–] karrbs@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

I was actually just thinking this when thinking about switching to @pixelfed i was thinking what if Instagram just converted to federated instance. How that would look

[–] Sigmatank@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure, but I wouldn't mind Mozilla in the fediverse. I thought I heard something about that being a possibility. At some point if things scale there will start to be a cost that has to be handled beyond donations, so what in hoping is there are maybe some trusted institutions that help out rather than Meta/Amazon/etc pushing into the space

[–] Rairii@haqueers.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Sigmatank@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fantastic. I wonder if they'll get a Lemmy instance going

[–] Rairii@haqueers.com 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@Sigmatank Right now, I actually prefer kbin to lemmy personally, although I don't have an account on either yet :)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›