this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
340 points (98.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9677 readers
83 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org 57 points 10 months ago

Reminded me of this video by Not Just Bike.

These Stupid Trucks are Literally Killing Us [35:26 | Mar 6, 2023 | Not Just Bikes] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jN7mSXMruEo

[–] Waker@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I'm from the EU and sadly this has become more and more the norm here. I remember a time when we had very little SUVs here but now they seem to be everywhere. And it's a really busy capital city, so the streets are narrow. I can't understand why people would buy big cars here...

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

Sadly, we cannot really ban them as they are utility vehicles that a small portion of the population needs. However, I still see freakin' ads that frame them as fancy cars.

Czech ad for Amarok V6
“The new Amarok V6. Pick-up truck for every day. Powerful and comfortable”

I suggest making it illegal to have them in any color other than matte excavator yellow (for construction) or green camo (for hunting and forestry).

Yellow truck Camo truck

[–] Waker@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Lmao at the color limits. I'm 100% sure that would get people not to buy them hahaha that's genius

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

In the US, the camo option would only make them cooler to the kind of people you really don’t want behind the wheel of them.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 4 points 10 months ago

Camo trucks already exist.

That being said, this idea is largely a joke, and I don’t mind @Waker@lemmy.world being sarcastic about it.

[–] Waker@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Ah crap you're right... I didn't account for the American factor.

[–] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago

One other measure that could easily be taken is to ban advertising for these.

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There are smaller trucks with the exact same bed size though. Like how the hell do people think European trades people haul stuff?

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ummm... vans of all sizes are way more common than flatbed trucks here.

[–] BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago

Or those small isuzu trucks. When the load is too awkward for a van.

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

forcing a "this vehicles kills pedestrian" warning on top, making it similar to sigarettes: all same boring packaging and a warning on top.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And beeping when reversing of course.

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

why beep when it can be a voice yelling WARNING! WARNING! WARNING! or ACHTUUUUNG!! if it's a German made car

[–] wieson@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Deer can't see orange, so one colour fits all ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

I'm ok with them being all orange instead of fucking blacked out.

[–] tankplanker@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Its not just SUVs in western Europe, EU crash regulations for cars hitting pedestrians have forced cars to be higher and taller at the front. Unless the seating position also rises then you lose visibility of the very front of the car. If the seating position has to rise then so does the roof and this often means the floor rises too.

Sure, these ridiculous American trucks are far far worse, and SUVs are just generally bad, but its normal cars as well.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

As someone with a utilitarian need for a truck in the US, you are correct. I m7ch rather drive a Fiat Panda than my 2013 Tundra. However, I try to keep my lights low (they are adjustable from inside the cab) so as not to blind others when on the road.

Still, there should be a federal ban on these stupid things, annd these, not to mention a federal law regulating how high headlights can be from the road (looking at you Ford F-250)

[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 31 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Gonna be great seeing Cybertrucks mow through pedestrians with their ridiculous blind spots and sharp stainless steel corners all over.

Honestly the thing is starting to remind me of the homer car, what a fucking joke

[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The Homer Simpson car, while it has its faults, is unironically better than everything in the SUV market.

  1. Sure it's got the pop up logo triangle, but the front is still overall better.

  2. Great viability, check out that dome. The design choices naturally focus the server outside the car rather than on instruments.

  3. Back seats also have a big dome to look out and realise there is a world outside the car, it's not just an iPad screen to fast-travel. Again, the focus is on what's outside the vehicle, not in it.

  4. On screens, there in not a single screen in that car.

  5. Low-loading height, height clearance, deep truck. Probably more on par with a van than an SUV.

  6. Low laying headlamps with standard incandescent bulbs, nothing that can temporarily blind people.

Sure it has rear-view viability issues, and the horn (and multitude of horn buttons) is problematic. But the Homer Simpson car is a good people and stuff mover. Could probably do without the shag carpeting though.

[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

HAHA I stand corrected. Musk wishes he had the Tesla Homer.

[–] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ok I'm gonna need a list of car models to not get run over by

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ohhhh So the title of the article was directed towards pedestrians, not car murder enthusiasts

[–] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 3 points 10 months ago

Well everyone should have a hobby

load more comments
view more: next ›