this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
100 points (94.6% liked)

Technology

59436 readers
3056 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 78 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I can't wait to have underpaid, non licensed, non professional people in my home doing potentially dangerous tasks and going through my personal things!

[–] doppelgangmember@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Wait til they try to get insurance involved too for "on-site injuries" and such -_-

[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Bro of course I left a live electrical wire floating around in there . He only provided a $5 tip. He deserves what's coming to him. What a piece of shit.

-The vast majority of ~~Uber Drivers~~ Grind Workers

[–] nfsu2@feddit.cl 1 points 1 year ago

I live in Chile and that happens already in regular uber service.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 59 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Next

TaskRabbit is testing a service that lets you hire a tasker to drive you somewhere

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

TaskRabbit is a terrible service. I hired a handyman once but when they arrived they were neither a man nor did I get a handy. 1/10

I'll see myself out.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Were they a rabbit, though? That would explain both..

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 year ago

So not only will Uber wear out your car but now your body too. Typical capitalistic greed.

[–] thorbot@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Modern Uber review: driver showed up but wouldn’t even wipe my ass. 0/5 stars

[–] theluddite@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

The goal of every company is to do shenanigans at the top while profiting off an underclass of laborers at the bottom. The more shenanigans they can do to squeeze the underclass harder, the better. Uber et al are genuine innovators in automating labor law violations to maximize that squeeze. Looks like they're expanding from chauffeurs to every other kind of household servant. Awesome. This will be very cool and fine.

[–] rivermonster@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So, self delivering slaves?

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They get paid for it. And can choose whether or not to take the chores jobs.

How is that slavery?

[–] baked_tea@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

So workers? Wth

[–] Mahlzeit@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I have never been able to understand Uber. They never invented anything new. Maybe there weren't e-hailing apps everywhere, but that's not so much better phoning for a taxi. The main thing they did was to spend an insane amount of money only to brush aside taxi regulations in the US and maybe some other countries. I have no idea how anyone expects to see a return on that "investment".

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Phoning a taxi was hell. You’d get an operator and he would throw a dart on the board as a time estimate for pickup. Then after going to the pickup area and waiting 20 minutes you’d get a call saying walk 6 blocks to another pickup area because another taxi is closer.

[–] MadBigote@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Uber was cheaper because they were burning VC, like every other startup. Uber service declined A LOT soon after that. At least in my country Uber drivers vehicles are complete trash, almost falling apart because Uber cannot afford to limit themselves to drivers with mint vehicles anymore.

[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

The parent commenter didn't even mention the price being an issue with taxis....

[–] Mahlzeit@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

That may explain something about why Uber succeeded in the US. I have no idea what a pickup area is. Isn't the point of calling a taxi that they pick you up where you are? Ring the doorbell? And if one dispatcher service is no good, why not use another?

[–] nix@merv.news 9 points 1 year ago

Have you used the e hailing apps and ordered a taxi? Its way better. Just sucks the corporate greed monster is ruining it. Although taxi medallion system was extremely predatory and terrible too

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Maybe there weren't e-hailing apps everywhere, but that's not so much better phoning for a taxi.

Tell me you've never phoned for a taxi without telling me you've never phoned for a taxi

Lmao, every single traditional taxi service I've ever used has had absolutely horrendous service. From rude to long waits (Hours...HOURS LONG) to intentionally driving longer routes if you weren't local (Since you wouldn't know otherwise). For awhile Uber was even cheaper than regular taxis.

Maybe they did toss aside taxi regulations, but it needed to be done, the taxi industry really needed some real competition.

Frankly, Uber could be twice as expensive than a regular taxi and I'll still choose it, I'm never going back to taxis

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They did all that, but they've also stirred the taxi ecosystem, which used to be full of rude dipshits who'd go the long way if they noticed you were not a local. Suddenly, they got competition in price and quality (the latter has been decaying).

I'm not defending Uber in any way.

[–] 50gp@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

true, taxi business everywhere has been a shitshow of sketchiness for such a "simple" concept

[–] lemmyingly@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Rich families in African countries already do this. Families have trusted drivers that they use to drive them around and send out to do errands for them.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Uber is experimenting with a new service that allows users to hire drivers from its app to complete everyday household chores and projects, in a bid to expand beyond its existing ridesharing and courier business.

The service, called Uber Tasks, will launch as a “small pilot” in the coming weeks in Fort Myers, Florida and Edmonton, Alberta.

According to a statement provided to The Verge by Uber spokesperson Conor Ferguson, users can advertise chores like furniture assembly, snow removal, at-home laundry, packing/unpacking, holiday decorating, yard cleanup, garden maintenance, and lawn mowing during the initial pilot.

Uber couriers and drivers can then browse the unclaimed tasks, with estimated earnings displayed before reserving.

“This small pilot is the newest way for drivers and couriers to put their skills to work and earn on their own schedule.”

The company has made other attempts to generate additional revenue in recent months, including the launch of a new flight booking service in the UK, and by sticking video ads in its apps.


The original article contains 265 words, the summary contains 167 words. Saved 37%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

Can I hire someone to do my job? I'll split the proceeds 50/50

[–] ad_on_is@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

oh... it's "chores" ... nevermind... I'll find myself out