this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
11 points (86.7% liked)

Selfhosted

40226 readers
1077 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Has anyone done their own shadowsocks?

I'm assuming you'll need to expose your port to WAN?

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fkn@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It depends on what you are trying to do... There are many tunnel / reverse proxy routing services like https://www.cloudflare.com/products/tunnel/

Here's a list https://github.com/anderspitman/awesome-tunneling

You can also get a super cheap vps, do some ssh reverse tunnel magic and go along with your day.

[–] randombullet@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

I'll read up. Thank you.

[–] MalReynolds 2 points 1 year ago

I use gluetun for vpn proxying, it's rock solid and has shadowsocks and tinyproxy (I run two instances, one localish openvpn and one out of country wireguard, gluetun don't care), that gets around port opening.

[–] stardreamer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Is there a specific reason you're looking at shadowsocks? The original developer has been MIA for years. People who used it in the past largely consider it insecure for its original stated purpose

trojan-gfw is a better modern replacement. However that requires a certificate in order to work. You can easily get one via lets encrypt.

At this point, let Shadowsocks, obfs, and kcp die a graceful death like GoAgent before it did.

[–] filister@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Why not Tailscale? I think it can do exactly that and it is very easy to configure.