Curious Why would anyone use piped instead of Newpipe or Yt-dlp?
this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2022
11 points (100.0% liked)
Privacy
31915 readers
668 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
because some people want to watch videos on their desktop PCs, in the browser, without downloading them.
There are numerous media players like mpvthat can stream youtube.
These instances are not only slow, they also sell their user's information.
Edit
piped also requires JavaScript to run.
Edit2: I wont be replying further. As they all are just spamming same argument again and again.
JS? Oh no just like every other website it uses JavaScript
These instances are not only slow, they also sell their user's information.
Citation needed
There are numerous media players like
mpv
that are not a part of the browser
they also sell their user's information.
I wish you a very [citation needed].
I wish you a very [citation needed].
These instances are not much popular so there isn't much evidence regarding it. Nor you have any evidence that it doesn't.
there isn’t much evidence regarding it. Nor you have any evidence that it doesn’t.
and only one of us posted a claim without backing it up with proof.
I have evidence that some don't. I am personnaly part of an association running a public instance with no user data sold whatsoever.
I have evidence that some don't.
Where? No one posted evidence in this thread.
some don't.
But some do. You can never be sure about all of them do same. Also what if some instances are running modified version of it.
personnaly
personally.
Of course you can never be sure. But you cannot be sure about any local player either. Even if it is libre software, it rely on trust. Or you would have to read every piece of software used. In the same way that some software are trustworthy enough to use, some hosts are too.
Sorry if I sound aggressive, I just try to be short <3 !
I've seen no reason to believe any privacy frontend I've used has done this. However, even if you are concerned about this, Freetube is a more convenient option which can use its own local API similar to how Newpipe does it while still keeping a nice interface with subscription management and such.
However, even if you are concerned about this, Freetube is a more convenient option which can use its own local API similar to how Newpipe does it while still keeping a nice interface with subscription management and such.
That's exactly what I said.
You only mentioned newpipe and mpv...
There are numerous media players like
mpvthat can stream youtube.
...yes, but freetube is actually comparable to the featureset of newpipe, piped, or invidious.
You're approaching this as a confrontation when it isn't one. You listed two players which are not necessarily replacements for a desktop user who wants subscription management and such, so I provided one which does.
These instances are not only slow, they also sell their user’s information.
I've long wondered about this regarding alternate frontends for big sites in general, but especially about the youtube frontends like piped and invidious which must require substantial resources to operate (though sometimes they're serving the video data itself directly from google, sometimes they're actually proxying it too)... but, I've never seen any evidence of it. Have you?
In any case, many of the popular instances are running on Microsoft or Oracle clouds, and/or Clownflare, so, from a privacy standpoint it isn't really much different than Google. I use them occasionally in Tor Browser just because they're less likely to be blocking a Tor exit than youtube proper is.
Watching videos over tor is not possible.
sure it is, i do it all the time. sometimes i'll get a too-slow circuit and need to try another, but, it works on the first try more often than not.
FreeTube would be what you are looking for instead of Yt-dip.
Thanks but I'm not looking for alternatives.
But it's still better than public instances of pipe.
It is not for you specifically but also for people to which you made a proposal in the form of an opinion.
I use the official one, piped.kavin.rocks, mostly because it's the one that I've learned about Piped from. I'm naively thinking that it's the least likely one to disappear, even though that's what happened with the main Invidious instance.
I wish there was an instance with a sane, short and easy to remember URL, like yewtu.be.
Is piped just invidious?
no.
Oh derrrp
pretty much