this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2022
11 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

31935 readers
742 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cout@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Curious Why would anyone use piped instead of Newpipe or Yt-dlp?

[–] noodlejetski@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

because some people want to watch videos on their desktop PCs, in the browser, without downloading them.

[–] cout@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

There are numerous media players like mpvthat can stream youtube. These instances are not only slow, they also sell their user's information. Edit piped also requires JavaScript to run.

Edit2: I wont be replying further. As they all are just spamming same argument again and again.

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

These instances are not only slow, they also sell their user's information.

Citation needed

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

JS? Oh no just like every other website it uses JavaScript

[–] noodlejetski@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

There are numerous media players like mpv

that are not a part of the browser

they also sell their user's information.

I wish you a very [citation needed].

[–] cout@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I wish you a very [citation needed].

These instances are not much popular so there isn't much evidence regarding it. Nor you have any evidence that it doesn't.

[–] noodlejetski@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

there isn’t much evidence regarding it. Nor you have any evidence that it doesn’t.

and only one of us posted a claim without backing it up with proof.

[–] PP44@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I have evidence that some don't. I am personnaly part of an association running a public instance with no user data sold whatsoever.

[–] cout@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I have evidence that some don't.

Where? No one posted evidence in this thread.

some don't.

But some do. You can never be sure about all of them do same. Also what if some instances are running modified version of it.

personnaly

personally.

[–] PP44@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Of course you can never be sure. But you cannot be sure about any local player either. Even if it is libre software, it rely on trust. Or you would have to read every piece of software used. In the same way that some software are trustworthy enough to use, some hosts are too.

Sorry if I sound aggressive, I just try to be short <3 !

[–] Whom@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I've seen no reason to believe any privacy frontend I've used has done this. However, even if you are concerned about this, Freetube is a more convenient option which can use its own local API similar to how Newpipe does it while still keeping a nice interface with subscription management and such.

[–] cout@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

However, even if you are concerned about this, Freetube is a more convenient option which can use its own local API similar to how Newpipe does it while still keeping a nice interface with subscription management and such.

That's exactly what I said.

[–] Whom@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You only mentioned newpipe and mpv...

[–] cout@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There are numerous media players like mpvthat can stream youtube.

[–] Whom@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

...yes, but freetube is actually comparable to the featureset of newpipe, piped, or invidious.

You're approaching this as a confrontation when it isn't one. You listed two players which are not necessarily replacements for a desktop user who wants subscription management and such, so I provided one which does.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

These instances are not only slow, they also sell their user’s information.

I've long wondered about this regarding alternate frontends for big sites in general, but especially about the youtube frontends like piped and invidious which must require substantial resources to operate (though sometimes they're serving the video data itself directly from google, sometimes they're actually proxying it too)... but, I've never seen any evidence of it. Have you?

In any case, many of the popular instances are running on Microsoft or Oracle clouds, and/or Clownflare, so, from a privacy standpoint it isn't really much different than Google. I use them occasionally in Tor Browser just because they're less likely to be blocking a Tor exit than youtube proper is.

[–] cout@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Watching videos over tor is not possible.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

sure it is, i do it all the time. sometimes i'll get a too-slow circuit and need to try another, but, it works on the first try more often than not.

[–] GlessasBakerfield@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

i use piped instances to run my native ios youtube app yattee

[–] Echedenyan@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

FreeTube would be what you are looking for instead of Yt-dip.

[–] cout@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thanks but I'm not looking for alternatives. But it's still better than public instances of pipe.

[–] Echedenyan@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It is not for you specifically but also for people to which you made a proposal in the form of an opinion.