DuckDuckGo. I can't live without !bangs.
this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2023
40 points (100.0% liked)
Asklemmy
43400 readers
1456 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Do you mean like !google or !amazon ? I use ddg. Just making sure I know what you mean
load more comments
(1 replies)
Kagi. Yes, it's paid and the pricing structure is really meh, but:
- Actual privacy
- No BS like with DDG
- AI features (like a "quick answer" feature that's really useful)
- Has its own index along with others
- Search results are great, probably better than DDG's
- "Lenses" (basically narrow results by a set of sites)
- Devs are pretty cool
For some reason the thought of a paid search engine has never even crossed by mind before. I've been using DDG but this has peaked my curiosity. Thank you.
Edit: The pricing is... very... meh.
It's so worth it.
It is very meh. But I think if you're able to, it's well worth the price. Just don't get the standard plan. That one is god awful.
I didn't know it was privacy focused or that they were building their own index, that's really cool. Do you think it's worth the money?
It's only a few bucks a month. I think so.
The only thing I don't like is needing to be logged in to search. That always feels like a huge invasion of privacy. The at least claim that they don't log search contents though
load more comments
(1 replies)
Kagi is absolutely wonderful. Highly recommend giving it ago. Gives me better results than google while having a fair privacy policy
Love Kagi. I switched and never had any reason to use Google again. Its that good.
I want to give it a try but it's hard to justify the cost with limited searches. I don't want to have to keep track of how many times I've searched or second guess if I "really need to search for that".
load more comments
(3 replies)
DuckDuckGo, but I've been testing Qwant (also privacy focused) lately as well.
SearX-NG, coming off DuckDuckGo it wasn't a major change in the internal structure (the search gets relayed over to a larger search engine), but there's no one company behind it like DDG. They've been working together with Microsoft on some rather sketchy things.
I would still love to self-host something decent (that doesn't relay over to a company), but nothing like that exists as far as I know.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Startpage. It uses Googles results, but you will not get tracked that much
load more comments
(1 replies)
I hate adds. I was using Neeva. Just switched to Kagi. After nearly 3 weeks, it looks like 300 searches/month will work for me. So $5 a month is fine.
Duckduckgo for the most part, especially if I already know where I want to get to. Google as a backup like others are saying.
Duck Duck Go. It just works for me. I've never had a problem with it's results.
I've been using SearXNG. It is a fork of SearX, a popular open source metasearch search engine. Basically SearX allows you to use multiple search engines for a search, and only the results are there, no ads. SearXNG changes the UI to be better, adds some other engines for a variety of things to search, like images. Currently I'm using ericafteric.top as my instance; it is the fastest US instance with search suggestions support since I can't selfhost.
I run my own SearXNG instance too. I set it up to a Hetzner box, then blocked all ports from the firewall except on the Tailscale network. This means the machine which wants to use the search needs to be connected first to the same Tailscale network. It allows me to prevent being blocked by the search providers for too much traffic and is been working great. I just open http://SearXNG from my browser and start searching.
Duck duck go first, and if results are shit, I default back to google
Most small search engines use bing results which are a hit or miss compared to Google.
Startpage is the only privacy focused one I found that uses Google search results. The UI is fine for the most part, except the image search maybe.
Edit: typo
load more comments
(1 replies)
DuckDuckGo
Just Google, unless I'm looking to pirate something. Then I use Yandex.
DuckDuckGo
I also use Firefox search bookmarks for searching specific sites.
Search Bookmark: You prepare the URL with a %s placeholder and give the bookmark a tag, and you can type tag searchterm and it'll open it.
I'm using it for opening word definitions, word translations, searching reference documentation, searching specific platforms/websites/media types, etc.
Google. Sue me, I really only care about results when it comes to search. It's mostly just Google and Bing actually providing results and Google's are better.
DDG first, Google if that fails and I think the query should have gotten good results, Bing Chat if I'm still really not sure about a topic or if I want some of its summarization (or I'm just feeling lazy).
DuckDuckGo. I wanted something privacy-respecting, but Startpage was blocked in my country and SearX had problems with my language. Anyway I've heard an advertising company bought Starpage so I wont use it. Also bang shortcuts are great!
(Also is it just me or DDG doesn't approve new bangs now?)
Google, because of inertia and not being given a good reason to switch.
duckduckgo primarily, but have been starting to dabble with a self hosted Whoogle.
Another DuckDuckGo user here. I really like it but wish I could use boolean with it.
You can, it just works a bit differently than google if that is what youβre used to. It doesnβt outright exclude results with -, just de-emphasizes it in the results, of course with how tailored many web pages are to gaming search algorithms that doesnβt do much. If you want to outright eliminate certain websites from the search you can do that with -site:siteyouwantgone.here
Ecosia on my tablet because of nice integrated browser and DuckDuck+Firefox on the PC
Am also checking out Brave on PC at the moment
Bing because I'm getting paid for it
brave search on desktop, DDG on mobile.
DDG, it works well enough for me, and not that I got used to bangs I cannot let go of them
Duckduckgo, works like I want it to and it's not Google. Never had a problem with its search results either. Tried several others as well including searx and ecosia but I found their image search inferior to ddg's.
Kagi is better though. I was using ddg for a long time but had to use Google now and then to get good results.
I use Brave Search. wAs going to switch to Neeva but they are shutting down now.
view more: next βΊ