this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
216 points (98.6% liked)

United Kingdom

4083 readers
66 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] erusuoyera@sh.itjust.works 82 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Friendly reminder that if you see someone shoplifting food, no you fucking didn't.

[–] riceandbeans161@discuss.tchncs.de 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

and remember to steal from corporations, not people

[–] DrPop@lemmy.one 13 points 1 year ago

I only steal from grocery chains, mom and pops don't deserve it.

[–] Chariotwheel@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

Posting my favourite Green Arrow moment again:

https://imgur.com/gallery/ZNelr3I

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, but do you think the right wing nutjobs who get angry about things like this care about evidence?

They're glad of another excuse to validate their anger against "them", and even if later evidence comes out to suggest something never happened, their rage and hatred has by this point only grown deeper.

We're on a path to a return to bring openly run by these sorts of people, and eventually all that deep hatred of "them" will come pouring out once there's the power to act against them on a national scale.

Us decent people are, by our nature, not angry and hateful enough to do anything to stop this until it's far too late. History repeats itself over and over :-(

[–] BrightCandle@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Way back in time I worked in a supermarket that first trialled self shopping. At the time this was done with special trolleys and boxes and hand scanners people took around the store to scan their own goods. The scheme survived about two years. The system was designed to gradually ramp up rescans by the checkout operators if prior scans had shown missing items. Certain people were clearly making a lot of mistakes (usually with expensive items like Whiskey) but many weren't. The increased waits for rescans for the people who often made such "errors" destroyed the value for everyone else and they became increasingly angry on what should have been near instant checkouts.

Its notable I think that almost all supermarkets today use self scanning despite all those earlier experiments showing that some people would use it to hide theft. This goes very much against the image of the pocket and exit that people have in their head. That was actually very uncommon and being a person who often greeted on the door it was my job to spot them. Most of the theft occurred through items that were smuggled through the checkout in some way.

I don't think self scanning is contributing to an increase in theft losses and the data shows its not. What I think it potentially contributes to is making it hard to identify the theft because there are less employees effectively as the security force. The decline in prosecutions is likely due to these changes that the supermarkets have adopted which they knew 25 years ago resulted in hidden theft.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

If you see someone stealing food or baby stuff. It is a case of observational error, in reality you didn't see shit.

[–] snacks@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

christ that is a badly written article. Oh wait its novara, the pound shop of journalism

[–] tenebrisnox@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago

I’ve just read that and can’t see anything badly written. Where was the bad writing? (Or is it just their views you don’t agree with?)

[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Interesting analysis.