this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
147 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

59483 readers
5306 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 52 points 1 year ago (6 children)

One question though: if I take the paid subscription, will meta keep harvesting my data and selling it to third parties? An ad-free Facebook is different from a tracking-free Facebook

[–] Neato@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago

There is nothing on this cold, moist rock that will stop companies from harvesting and selling your data other than the inevitable embrace of death.

[–] _s10e@feddit.de 20 points 1 year ago

Actual answer over circle-jerk speculation: To be legal in EU, they must offer one option without required (=forced) consent to tracking. When you pay, you can actually opt-out from any measure that require consent under GDPR.

All European publishers do this. They don't want your money and probably don't care much about the tiny minority that actually pays for freedom from tracking. This option exist to create the illusion of choice.

[–] Virkkunen@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

Hold your horses, they only said "ad free", "tracking free" is beyond the scope, making this essentially a double dip.

[–] netchami@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Yes. They absolutely will.

[–] Pechente@feddit.de 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I would have loved this option like 10 years ago – when it wasn't clear what a toxic company facebook is.

[–] ericisshort@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

It was pretty clear what a toxic company facebook was 10 years ago. I'd say it was already becoming increasingly clear by the time The Social Network released in 2010.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Would've caught zero traction then lol. You can only do this if you have a very established and dedicated userbase already. Trying this from scratch with little users is a death sentence.

[–] pavnilschanda@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'd take this over ads any day

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 49 points 1 year ago

It's not like they're going to stop collecting data on you.

[–] ubermeisters@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean Ill continue to take "not using the services" any day

[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same here, but only if its reasonably priced. Otherweise I probably should stop using it.

In Instagram I only habe one Person I'd Miss from the family. In Facebook it's friends and family from other countries and so many that it's still practical to habe a facebook account. But let's see.

[–] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

€9.99/month if paying on the Web, €13/month if you want to pay from within the Android or iOS apps. Not worth it IMO, especially since they say nothing about not collecting your data.

E: pricing correction

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago

Those companies are fucking delusional. Not even on it's height would that be worth it to me. Just goes to show how much money they extracted from you via ads before.

[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah, too much for me.

[–] alex@jlai.lu 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

(I don't think that's it - it's 9.99 if you're paying on desktop and 12.99 with the Apple tax (also applied to Android), but applies to your whole account.)

[–] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I see that now, I'll edit. Thanks

[–] crit@links.hackliberty.org 15 points 1 year ago

Maybe if they hadn't already harvest my data for decades. Now that it's no longer as profitable they want me to pay to just avoid being nagged?

[–] CatTrickery@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Hopefully the EU makes an example of them for providing an extreme drawback to opting out for users. They know full well that this isn't how data protection is intended.

[–] JakenVeina@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

It's telling that this is omly for GDPR countries. They don't want YOUR money, they want advertisers' and data analysts' money. A subscription isn't as profitable as selling your personal data. How fucked up is that?

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Honestly - as much as Facebook is a horrible behemoth, this makes sense to me. How do you pay for the service? By watching ads. Or you pay a subscription.

[–] xep@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Someone made this point above, but if that were true this would've been implemented in every country, not just the ones with GDPR.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

The relevant reasoning [of how this makes sense in terms of alternative to privacy and regarding GDPR compliance]:

The option for people to purchase a subscription for no ads balances the requirements of European regulators while giving users choice and allowing Meta to continue serving all people in the EU, EEA and Switzerland. In its ruling, the CJEU expressly recognised that a subscription model, like the one we are announcing, is a valid form of consent for an ads funded service.

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

they're insane.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago