Technology

59340 readers

5398 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Samsung confirms satellite connectivity on Galaxy S24 for emergencies - SamMobile (www.sammobile.com)

submitted 1 year ago by ijeff@lemdro.id to c/technology@lemmy.world

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemdro.id/post/2632247 (!android@lemdro.id)

cross-posted from: https://lemdro.id/post/2632133 (!samsung@lemdro.id)

all 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Aopen@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Connects to satellite and uses mmwaves, cant receive fm radio

[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Size of the antenna for satellites and mmwaves : 10mm, size of the antenna for FM radio: 40cm.

[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

It also doesn't have a tape deck!

[+] ClopClopMcFuckwad@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

[deleted]

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Great to know. Lack of broadband is one of the main things keeping me from going to space

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Now you can plan your trip to Uranus with turn by turn directions.

[–] endlessmeddler@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can you explain a little more about what this is and why it would be a game changer. I'm still stuck in the "satellite Internet is garbage" mindset. I know people are generally pretty happy with starlink though.

[–] nick8@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

One key difference is the orbit of the satellites.

Traditional satellite Internet uses a constellation of 10's of satellites in geostationary orbit (35,000 km elevation) - since they are so far away relatively few satellites are needed but latency and bandwidth are pretty bad.

Next gen satellite Internet like starlink and kuiper use constellations of 1000's of satellites in low earth orbit (550km elevation). These are super close so latency is much better, but you need way more satellites to get consistent coverage- but that also means bandwidth can be much better too.

These low earth orbit satellites are so close that they can basically put standard cellular antenna on them and they act like cell towers in space. Your phone can use the same antenna it already has to connect to them. But the signal is pretty weak so to start they will only support text messaging. Still, that's good enough to replace things like my Garmin InReach so I'm pretty excited.

At least that's my understanding from the T-Mobile and starlink partnership- this Samsung thing might be something slightly different.

[–] Sensitivezombie@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago

As a backpacker, this is good news.

[–] rhythmisaprancer@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

So no escape? And more satellites?