this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2023
21 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37712 readers
154 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
Los@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
21
RedHat dropping support for LibreOffice (lwn.net)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Penguincoder@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I get that LibreOffice isn't really needed on a server or Windows based enterprise; but i take it as this means RHEL is going to remove these packages from official repositories.

Does this mean LibreOffice won't have RH as a supporter and maintainer?

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CasualTee@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It looks like they are shifting their focus on lower level desktop features. And they expect flatpack to be the main way to get LibreOffice on RHEL down the line.

That makes sense IMO. Linux desktop is currently lagging behind for anything related to visual arts (design, 2D/3D arts, photo/video editing, ...) because of the lack of HDR support. And this despite the great tools available on Linux (Blender, Krita).

So if they stop supporting the LibreOffice RPM, knowing there are alternatives, to focus on such features, then why not.

[–] ollien@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Well, it sounds like they're also not going to be maintaining the Flatpak long-term, just upstreaming some fixes. Am I reading this wrong? Not sure who maintains the Flatpak; hopefully someone other than RH...

[–] Raincloud@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

I guess Flatpak it is. Bummer about the huge overhead of storage space you need for flatpaks, but it's the technology the Red Hat side of things have been pushing for years.

[–] kool_newt@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope it will continue to be available on EPEL or something.

[–] carlwgeorge@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

It probably will be, as long as someone is willing to maintain it there. EPEL gets engineering and infrastructure resources from Red Hat, but individual packages are maintained by volunteers.