this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
144 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3187 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

America’s drug overdose crisis is out of control. Washington, despite a bipartisan desire to combat it, is finding its addiction-fighting programs are failing.

In 2018, Republicans, Democrats and then-President Donald Trump united around legislation that threw $20 billion into treatment, prevention and recovery. But five years later, the SUPPORT Act has lapsed and the number of Americans dying from overdoses has grown more than 60 percent, driven by illicit fentanyl. The battle has turned into a slog.

Even though 105,000 Americans died last year, Congress is showing little urgency about reupping the law since it expired on Sept. 30. That’s not because of partisan division, but a realization that there are no quick fixes a new law could bring to bear.

Aiming to expand access to treatment, Congress in December eliminated the waiver and training requirements physicians needed to prescribe buprenorphine, which helps patients stop taking fentanyl. The Drug Enforcement Administration recently extended eased pandemic rules for prescribing it via telemedicine through the end of 2024.

A bipartisan group of representatives focused on mental health and substance use has proposed more than 70 bills this Congress to fight the overdose crisis, but none of them has inspired the kind of urgency lawmakers showed five years ago when they packaged bills into one landmark package: the SUPPORT Act.

The law’s expiration on Oct. 1 means states are no longer required to cover all of the FDA-approved treatments for opioid use disorder through Medicaid but public health advocates don’t expect any state to drop that coverage.

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShunkW@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, drug treatment has become a very, very lucrative industry. Being an alcoholic who needed medical detox recently, the horrors of finding an adequate facility I could afford was rough. Too many predatory companies out there are just looking to make a quick buck off the vulnerability of others.

[–] GONADS125@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I lost two family members to fentanyl in one year. My aunt was so fucked up she didn't realize she cracked the back of her skull open on the floor when she fell, and then she got back up and went to bed for the last time. A few months prior to this, her grand daughter died of a fentanyl overdose. The mother died many years ago due to overdose.

Fuck addiction. And fuck fentanyl in particular. I worked professionally with an adult population which had high rates of drug use, and everyone will tell you how much more dangerous it is, regardless if they're a mental health professional, a drug user, or both.

We need so much more funding for evidence-based programs and resources. We need to address and tackle homeless as well, because the two problems are so intertwined. I can't tell you how many clients I had on my caseload tell me that they never had drug use problems until they had to live on the streets.

The sad truth is that severe mental illness, disordered drug use, and homelessness are highly related, and the Department of Corrections (DOC) is the largest mental health provider in the U.S. since deinstitutionalization. It's a revolving door where an individual gets arrested, becomes sober/stable on anti-psychotics and/or mood stabilizers, is released without a proper support system, relapse occurs and/or medication is failed to be refilled, a psychotic episode or drug-induced psychosis presents, 911 is called, and rinse and repeat.

I worked exclusively with adults living at residential care facilities and assisted living facilities which this population often ended up at, especially if the courts were petitioned to assign a public administrator as a court-appointed guardian (most of my clients fell into this category). Some RCFs and ALFs were far from ideal and I hotlined facilities/assisted DHSS and DMH with investigations at various facilities.

But we need more places like this that can be described almost as a cross between a nursing facility and a halfway house, that provides residential care for these individuals (food, cleaning, meds, etc.). I worked for a 3rd party agency providing case management services for this particular population, and the type of work I did was called Community Psychiatric Rehabilitation.

I would work with these people to teach them coping skills/utilize evidence-based resources, I hosted an illness management and recovery (IMR) group, taught them how to improve their daily living abilities, helped apply for grants and resources, and I would assist people in the community (e.g. teaching budgeting skills or ensuring healthcare literacy in medical appointments). Essentially, my ultimate purpose and goal was to help these people transition from their facilities back into the community, or at least to a more independent setting.

In order to address the opioid/fentanyl crisis, we must also address the homelessness crisis as well as establish a better safety net and social programs to actually support our previously incarcerated population. There needs to be systemic change in the way we treat our criminals and individuals with severe mental illness and/or substance use disorder.

One thing that my years at that job working with that population really cemented is that black and white thinking is just a false construct, and we all really live in the grey. I worked with great humans who committed truly bad acts which they regretted deeply. It's too easy for people to marginalize this population, but they are very vulnerable individuals who deserve a proper shot at life with real support, often for the first time in their lives.

At the same time, having personal relationships and loss of members of family who fell into this population, you also have to set firm boundaries and make hard decisions to protect yourself from friends/loved ones struggling with addiction.

Thank you for doing that work.

[–] bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe they will realize soon that they have fucked this world up so bad that disproportionately more people don’t even want to deal with it. Fuck, Canada has the same issues, and we even have MAID now that they suggest to people because the country doesn’t want to care for them anymore (veterans, disabled people who can’t afford rent with the lower disability payments).

Then you have the fact that the medical systems still push too many opioids, and people who reach too high of a tolerance on standard opioid medications seek out something stronger like fentanyl. If only they made access to other pain relief as easy (like cannabis), but that won’t happen until Purdue can put it into a prescience bottle.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuck, Canada has the same issues, and we even have MAID now that they suggest to people because the country doesn’t want to care for them anymore (veterans, disabled people who can’t afford rent with the lower disability payments).

MAID requires two separate doctors to sign off on. Is there any actual evidence that people struggling to pay rent have been recommended for MAID?

Or is this just so deliciously outrageous that we're just going to repeat it often enough that it becomes mistaken for the truth?

[–] bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Nudding@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anybody deemed mentally sound should have the option of a safe and painless suicide. Or is it only okay to kill people when they are guilty of a crime?

[–] bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You are widely missing ehe point. It shouldn’t be an option if the only reason is ‘rent is to high for my government benefits’. That’s an absolute failure by the government

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

Good thing that's not a real option.

[–] Nudding@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That isn't happening. Get fucked you little bitch and go back to Facebook

[–] bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

You can’t even come up with something yourself? So your arrogant AND stupid, I thought so.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anyone can recommend anything. I recommend you find a large trash bin and sleep in it like Oscar the Grouch to save on rent and improve your current smell. Please find find two doctors to sign off on it.

[–] bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s your attitude when confronted with evidence that goes against what you say? Get fucked you little bitch and go back to Facebook

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Evidence? Look at the first link you sent me.

This is not government policy. This was not serious. This was a military grunt making a dumb joke that he got reprimanded for, that CTV is using for click bait and idiots like you are taking as fact.

Your media literacy is embarrassing.

[–] bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Are you really complaining about media literacy when you are just making assumptions based on…nothing? Writing this off as ‘just a military grunt’ is so obviously ignorant it tells me you don’t really care about the evidence provided since you are just going to nitpick words and sentences, then make wild assumptions (like knowing exactly what was going through that persons mind that makes it a ‘joke’) and conclude that you were right.

[–] Sabin10@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Might be time to stop prescribing painkillers that used to be for palliative care to people with tooth aches.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At the absolute bare minimum make Purdue Pharma pay for aftercare to make sure the patient doesn't have withdrawals or turns to illicit use.

The only way a one time fine makes sense, is if they stop profiting from it.

[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We did that, that's part of how we got here.

The people that were already addicted (not to fentanyl, mind you. More to the likes of Vicodin, oxycontin, etc.) turned to street vendors because we didn't offer them any support to get off the drugs. Used to be they got heroin. Then, the street vendors more and more were cutting fentanyl into other painkillers to cut costs as demand and tolerances crept higher and higher. That's how these overdoses happen; many of those that suffer a fentanyl overdose didn't know that they were using fentanyl. Even if they do know what they're using, the difference between an overdose and living another day is less than a milligram of the stuff. Better hope whoever cut it had the tools and wits to be extremely precise about it.

Rest assured though, it's far more difficult now to be prescribed any clean, government regulated painkiller beyond ibuprofen even with a legitimate short-term use case.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

It’s still not that difficult to get opiate prescriptions in the us.

[–] rivermonster@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Either of the two capitalist parties pretending to attempt to fight an issue where the core problem is capitalism is laughable.

Watch my theater, dance, dance, talk, talk... FFS

[–] LifeOfChance@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Well no shit it's climbing. America is collapsing right now. People who have a genuine will to work aren't able to afford anything let alone a roof over their head. I have no shame in even admitting I'd be doing much harder drugs if I didn't have a family who needs me. My aunt who runs a rehab clinic says she is losing patients to OD and gaining new ones who never touched a drug until they started losing housing and food. It's cheaper to numb the pain than it is to get just a bandaid from a PCP for crying out loud.

[–] chemicalprophet@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The drug war foments its own problems. The drugs aren't the problem.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Stopping drugs wasn't the purpose of the war on drugs.

[–] rrrurboatlibad@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Alright, sorry for the dumb question, but what exactly is fentanyl and where does it come from? Why has it replaced other drugs? Why is it so cheap?

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

All of those questions sound easily googleable.

[–] rrrurboatlibad@lemdro.id 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Congrats on your lack of information, I guess.

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Congress effort?

Congress DOES stuff?!?!?!