politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
MAID requires two separate doctors to sign off on. Is there any actual evidence that people struggling to pay rent have been recommended for MAID?
Or is this just so deliciously outrageous that we're just going to repeat it often enough that it becomes mistaken for the truth?
It required two doctors to sign off, but there is no restrictions on who can recommend it.
https://beta.ctvnews.ca/national/politics/2022/12/2/1_6179325.amp.html
https://globalnews.ca/news/9176485/poverty-canadians-disabilities-medically-assisted-death/amp/
Anybody deemed mentally sound should have the option of a safe and painless suicide. Or is it only okay to kill people when they are guilty of a crime?
You are widely missing ehe point. It shouldn’t be an option if the only reason is ‘rent is to high for my government benefits’. That’s an absolute failure by the government
Good thing that's not a real option.
That isn't happening. Get fucked you little bitch and go back to Facebook
You can’t even come up with something yourself? So your arrogant AND stupid, I thought so.
Anyone can recommend anything. I recommend you find a large trash bin and sleep in it like Oscar the Grouch to save on rent and improve your current smell. Please find find two doctors to sign off on it.
That’s your attitude when confronted with evidence that goes against what you say? Get fucked you little bitch and go back to Facebook
Evidence? Look at the first link you sent me.
This is not government policy. This was not serious. This was a military grunt making a dumb joke that he got reprimanded for, that CTV is using for click bait and idiots like you are taking as fact.
Your media literacy is embarrassing.
Are you really complaining about media literacy when you are just making assumptions based on…nothing? Writing this off as ‘just a military grunt’ is so obviously ignorant it tells me you don’t really care about the evidence provided since you are just going to nitpick words and sentences, then make wild assumptions (like knowing exactly what was going through that persons mind that makes it a ‘joke’) and conclude that you were right.