this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
-18 points (33.9% liked)

World News

32318 readers
982 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

this statistic does not account for Tesla loyalists, as three-quarters of Tesla owners indicated that they would continue with EVs.

Some people just like Elon Musk

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bad headline. The text says "would consider", which is significantly different.

Furthermore, they don't identify the study at all, so I can't even go look at it. I don't see one on S&P Global Mobility's site that looks like the right one.

[–] peter@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, considering options is a sensible thing to do

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Looks like this statistic is being dragged down heavily by Nissan Leaf owners. The Leaf is a very niche car - not much space, horrible range, and questionable reliability. It's not surprising that a lot of owners have buyer's remorse.

[–] Chimaeratorian@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure you're referencing the correct statistic related to the main takeaway of this article. Nissan EV owners were the second-highest group after Tesla (63.2%) to buy another EV, they were just low on model loyalty, not switching back to an ICE.

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Ah I think you're right, I was reading too fast and saw the very low percentage of Leaf owners who said they'd get another Leaf but they're still on the EV bandwagon

The battery in the Leaf isn't liquid cooled either, so they don't last nearly as long as other EV batteries

[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe, but I guess it suits certain purposes.

We're never going back to ICE, though. Quite happy with our leaf, would happily upgrade to something else but charging it a couple of times a week is no bother

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been similarly happy with my Bolt. I've had it for 3 years and can't imagine going back to ICE, except maybe for a roadster. I miss my Miata.

It helps that I charge at work for free, but even before I had this job is was nbd to charge at the grocery store once a week. I struggle to understand people who are hesitant to try out EVs.

How has the reliability on your Leaf been?

I can't think of any issues we've had, at all. There's so little to go wrong with them...

They're certainly less riddled with things to break than other Nissans I've driven. More like a basic Toyota in some ways

[–] carbonprop@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have had an Ev for a year. Would not switch back. I'm saving too much money.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Have an EV commuter car and a gas minivan.

No way I'm going back to double gas, I'm putting 25,000km a year on the EV and less than 5,000km on the van.

I'm saving a massive amount with current gas and electric prices where I live.

[–] Designate6361@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Still can't even afford an EV to even think about switching back to one ...

[–] Auzy@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I've seen this crappy article posted to a few places. You can't simply exclude entire brands of EVs.

If you're going to exclude Tesla, why not also exclude the worst brand too?

This article was clearly aimed at ICE owners

[–] Auzy@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

By the way, here in Australia, this nonsense article also made it to drive . Com . Au which also pushes ICE cars a bit

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The McGraws and the George W. Bush family have close ties dating back several generations.

Interesting to find out about S&P Global.

[–] Siddhartha-Aurelius@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Plug in hybrids are the best of both worlds. Any of the Toyota primes would be the ideal vehicle for most people. Too bad it’s near impossible to get one even if you have the money.

[–] Junkers_Klunker@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Plugins are the worst of both worlds unless you pull in and charge every 50 km to not let the battery drain completely, because if that happens you just end up with an insanely heavy ICE car thats even worse on fuel than an ICE car without all the hybrid shit.

[–] Siddhartha-Aurelius@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I have been driving one for years. I only put gas in it on road trips. No need for extra charging time just go. For daily activities I never need to use gas. You’re spreading from speculation, I’m speaking from experience.

Admittedly, they are heavier. You got that bit right. I still got 40mpg on road trips.

[–] Junkers_Klunker@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I drove a plugin for 2 years daily, it only did 12-13kml without battery and 30km on a charge. Granted it was a Mitsubishi Outlander phev which isnt exactly the greatest car.

[–] Siddhartha-Aurelius@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you took your experience with an admittedly bad car and generalized all other cars based on it?

If I buy a Kia I shouldn’t expect it to drive like a Bentley just because they both have an IC engine.

[–] Junkers_Klunker@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Now youre putting words in my mouth, the Mitsubishi wasnt a bad car, just wasnt great. The problem with plugins is that when operating as an ev its an heavy low performance low range ev and when its operating as an ICE car its a heavy low performance gas guzzling ICE car. sure there are a perfect spot where it makes sense, but it is damn near impossible to balance at that spot. If you want an ev for city driving then buy that and spend a little more time charging when going a long way from home. Or buy a more expensive ev that can go further on a charge and charge quicker. The rangeproblem on evs is near not existing where i live. A better solution if range is a concern would be an ev with a rangeextender like the bmw i3 where you are using the ICE only to charge the battery when necessary and therefore can be much smaller and lighter.

[–] MJBrune@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Hasn't S&P Global Mobility been known to favor oil companies or had ties with them? I did some light searching and didn't see a connection immediately but I thought they were tied to oil.

Either way, https://www.spglobal.com/mobility/en/research-analysis/does-the-auto-industry-have-an-ev-loyalty-problem.html is a direct link to the study. It turns out this is about luxury car loyalty and space issues.

The Bolt saw households that went for gas power mostly turning to Chevrolet SUVs and trucks.

That's understandable as there aren't many large cars for EVs. Something the VW ID Buzz will fix if everything they present about the car is true. I am super excited about it and I am typically not excited about cars.

In terms of range and infrastructure, I feel like one concept theory that was originally pushed around at the start of EVs almost a decade ago was replaceable batteries. Drive up to a station, swap the battery out with a full one, and drive off. That doesn't seem like the direction we are heading but it might be a way to solve it. That said 200-250 miles with 30-minute charge times to get up to 80% should be enough for typical day driving in the USA.

That said, I also feel these studies reflect somewhat, not on loyalty for Musk but on brand loyalty. For a lot of people, Teslas are truly great and fast cars. In other cases, they are terrible. Not all of their cars have terrible build quality and there seems to be a point where build quality dropped. Equally, there are some great EVs out there including the Chevy Bolt. You can see that most Bolt owners are only switching because they need something bigger and still 63% of them would stay with an EV.

The issue is not price, range, or infrastructure. It's a lack of choice and a lack of build quality.