this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
341 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3104 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Both Republican and Democratic senators emphasize that any successor to Kevin McCarthy will inherit the divided government that befell him — with another shutdown looming.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 95 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I think they're more interested in repeating history than learning from it.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago

I think you're absolutely right. Jordan won his election with over 69%. He is in no danger of losing his seat. It's beneficial for him to run around screaming and throwing political hand grenades. There's no incentive for him to try and negotiate with the white house or Senate. It's a long way off but I really hope the house flips big time in the next election.

[–] kittenbridgeasteroid@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Their entire goal is to repeat history. They want non-white people back in the fields and women back in the kitchen. They want to go back to a time where only rich white men have rights.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think they’d settle for neofeudalism

[–] NovaPrime@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Hint: that's what we have now

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

House republicans are running their party like they have all three chambers, and a huge majority. In reality, they’ve only got 4 seats that they can afford to lose in the only chamber that they control. To pass a bill means doing it with Denocratic support (from the Senate and Executive).

They’re going to need to pick someone that basically all Republicans can agree on, so it’s not going to be one of the most extreme ones.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 102 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They're not trying to pass anything...

They want the government shut down. And a handful of em can do it on their own, so they are

[–] RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip 42 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Exactly . This looks great for Gaetz since he only cares about pandering to the Nazi extremes of his party. He doesn’t care if the government shuts down, to him that’s just stopping the democrats. He will spin it that way and his base will lap it up. Most won’t be impacted and the ones who are he figures won’t matter.

Our government is effectively frozen and at the end of the month it’s going to shut down entirely. A handful of maga fucks have figured out how to do that with our antiquated rules set in place by men who believed all men would forever possess a conscience and morality. These shit goblins possess neither.

We need a democratic super majority so that we can pass sweeping reforms and ensure this doesn’t happen again. We need the ability to oust these cucks so they’re forced to scurry back into whatever hole they crawled out of. Trumps going down. Rudy is broke. Johnny MyPillow is eating shit. Keep that energy, focus in on the rest of these traitors. Send them back to the dysfunctional states that shit them out and remind them that their federal funding is dependent on them not being complete ass hats. No more pandering to these idiots. Bring the hammer down hard.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

This looks great for Gaetz...

I'll bet 100 USD that Gaetz isn't around much longer. My guess is that he'll be bounced out of the HoR before the end of the year, maybe right after they restart in 2024 but no longer than that. He ended his political career with this stunt.

[–] RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 year ago

I’d love to see it but the republicans have to do it themselves and they’ve shown that there’s next to nothing they won’t tolerate to keep a voting body.

Now what’s interesting to me is Madison Cawthorn going down pretty much immediately. And what did he do that bought him such a quick exit? While they’ll claim x or y, to me it was him talking about republican cocaine orgies. Which sounds outlandish. But there was an immediate concentrated effort to oust him. He had that picture get dropped and whatnot. What spooked them? Odd that such an outlandish thing would get them worked up. Unless of course it’s true. Hrmmmm.

[–] mx_smith@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I don’t know I just heard an NPR article where they were interviewing people from Pensacola and it seemed the stupid republicans were happy he made this move.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Start volunteering for 2024 then! We all got some work to do in the elections this year

[–] kittenbridgeasteroid@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yup, they want it to shut down so they can somehow blame it on the democrats.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nope, they want to shut it all down because they don't think there should be a federal government.

They'll blame it on the Dems, but that's not why they want it shutdown

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Also because shutting down the US funding for Ukraine is good for Russia.

[–] Redonkulation@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That may be their plan, but for the first time in my life it feels like nobody is buying that bullshit right now. We have news presenters and reporters actively laughing at Republican representatives when they try to swing the blame, and I feel the public at large understands exactly what's happening.

[–] kittenbridgeasteroid@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Their base is still buying their bullshit, though, and they're brainwashed so that won't change soon.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

The benefits of a cult, right?

[–] Redonkulation@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

True the base won't change anytime soon, but those aren't the people you try to convince to switch. It's the voters stuck in between.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not like they did much legislating when they had all 3. They just stuffed the supreme court which has had a worse effect.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Somewhat off-topic, but I thought this quote from the article was particularly interesting:

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said he has only one piece of advice for House Republicans in picking a new speaker: “I hope whoever the next speaker is gets rid of the motion to vacate. I think it makes the speaker’s job impossible, and the American people expect us to have a functioning government.”"

Funny you should mention that, Mitch, because people have been saying the exact same thing about the filibuster for years now.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

When I read that I rolled my eyes so hard they fell out of my head

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

"Yeah, but that's different, because it benefits me."

[–] CapgrasDelusion@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"The American people expect us to govern,” said Sen. John Kennedy, R-La. “I’d also advise all of my House colleagues to be sure to take your meds.”

Can't wait to see that one on poster board behind Jamie Raskin at the next impeachment theater event.

[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

LOL and from a conservative. They tend to be very much anti-antidepressant these days, so that's a really low blow.

[–] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Someone should slip all of the RNC some mushrooms.

[–] lateraltwo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Surveys have been published about the effect of MDMA has been shown to give Libertarians empathy

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah but they might be pro antipsychotics after watching the Treason Caucus in action in the House

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More Conservative then Kevin "everything Republicans do is the Democrat's fault" McCarthy? What's more Conservative than that?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think the next time will take 15 rounds of voting, but there's going to be a long while before the first vote. I also think that neither Scalise or Jordan (who is my guess) can rely on any votes from the democrats. It would be fun watching the GOP implode further if the stakes weren't so high.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I agree I don't think it'll go to a vote until it's completely a lock. Hopefully Gaetz will have another temper tantrum and be an even bigger embarrassment.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Did they tell them how to tie their shoes and wipe their noses too?

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Moderate Republicans, including the 18 from districts Biden won, are told by the Senate that falling in line with their radical colleagues will take them no closer to governing. Will it work? Perhaps not, but the attempt was made.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If this becomes a far right vs moderate Republican war I think the Democrats will grab a few bowls of popcorn and just watch the fireworks

[–] bluGill@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

They lose if they do. If they work with the moderate republicans they can get a moderate republican All democrats + 30 republicans is enough to elect a moderate speaker, while all republicans will only elect a speaker less moderate.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why not get 6 republicans to back Jeffries?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Politics are so divisive right now anyone who works with the other party is almost inviting a more extreme primary challenger.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Obviously, they need to fins someone who has bipartisan support. By this, I mean 2/3 of the House parties (Democrat, Republican, MAGA.)

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Never going to happen.

The MAGA party is now all about "Never admit fault. Always blame others. Compromise is weakness. Losing is not acceptable.".

These people got into office because their voters want the crazy. They want the Jewish Space Lasers and the Beetlejuice hand jobs and Hunter Biden's dick pics. Any attempt to work with "normal" Republicans or Democrats! is unacceptable and grounds for expulsion, and these people would be putting their seats at risk to a primary challenger even crazier and dumber than they are.

Similarly, the "mainstream" Republicans feel the same way. Kevin McCarthy just said himself that the GOP knows they're supposed to be working with Democrats but they literally don't want to because they think that since they have the majority, they should just be able to do whatever they want. And it's been that way for decades now. See the Hastert rule as a prime example. Or McConnell's mantra where anything and everything the Democrats do must be opposed by default, even if the idea was originally a Republican idea that Democrats support. A Republican being willing to side with Hakeem Jeffries or even willing to negotiate with Democrats to elect a more moderate Republican would be political suicide for a lot of these people.

And there's no possible way a Democrat is voting for either a Republican or a MAGA nut. Even if the candidate were to make all sorts of promises, there's no way for the Democrats to actually enforce those promises once they become speaker because the GOP has the majority, and they have absolutely no issues with going back on their word.

Which means this is going to be one hell of a wild ride. Given our current political climate, I cannot see how any viable candidate has a path to 218, nor do I see any one of the 3 sides being willing to back down.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

But will they? Seems like the maga group want one that's frothing and screaming.

You Will Respect My Authoritah!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The eight Republicans who voted to boot McCarthy complained that he relied on Democrats to keep the government open and failed to advance their conservative policy priorities.

But any new Republican speaker will inherit the divided government that befell the last one, as fears grow about how to prevent a shutdown on Nov. 17, approve new aid to Ukraine and advance other must-pass bills to keep agencies functioning.

McCarthy spent his nine months as speaker dancing on a knife edge of functionality and paralysis, constantly struggling to balance the demands of his aggressive right flank and the necessity of dealing with a Senate and a White House run by Democrats.

Senate Minority Whip John Thune, R-S.D., said the eight rebels who ousted McCarthy, as well as others in the House GOP, should remember who controls the rest of the government.

In an interview Thursday, Jordan, who has a long history as a right-wing firebrand, was noncommittal on the motion-to-vacate rule and downplayed the prospects of further U.S. aid to Ukraine without a clear sense of the endgame for defeating Russia.

Asked what they could do that McCarthy couldn’t, Gaetz said they’d pass the Republican appropriations bills that include a host of spending cuts and conservative policy provisions.


The original article contains 1,050 words, the summary contains 207 words. Saved 80%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›