this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43394 readers
1294 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

edit: didn't see rule 1, but anyway I expect answers to be open ended. Just give your thoughts

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WillardHerman@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

We are fundamentally ignorant, and are tricked by our brains into thinking we fundamentally know.

Have a look at the book, “The Self Illusion” by Bruce Hood and "The Mind is Flat" by Nick Chater.

[–] altair222@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Very simplistic question demanding very simplistic answer on a subject with a history of 2000+ years of epistemology that should have been in a philosophy community instead of asklemmy.

[–] ilk@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

One could get good answers from a philosophy community, I agree. My original motivation was getting answers from people in general further than philosophy-subscribed people, almost like trying to start a discussion with friends, you know? One can always do own research or ask an AI otherwise.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

We all build models of the world based on the information we're exposed to. Majority of the information we have about the world doesn't come through direct experience, and that makes it difficult for us to evaluate the accuracy of the information we operate on. As long as our direct experience doesn't contradict our model then we have no reason to question it.

What we can be said to know fundamentally is what we have genuine experience with. Somebody working in a particular domain or studying it for personal interest has fundamental understanding of the problems solved in that domain.