this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
291 points (95.6% liked)

World News

39041 readers
2608 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Conservative cardinals had challenged the pope to confirm teachings on LGBTQ+ issues

Pope Francis has suggested there could be ways to bless same-sex unions, responding to five conservative cardinals who challenged him to affirm church teaching on homosexuality ahead of a big meeting where LGBTQ+ Catholics are on the agenda.

The Vatican on Monday published a letter Francis wrote to the cardinals on 11 July after receiving a list of five questions, or dubia, from them a day earlier. In it, Francis suggests that such blessings could be studied if they did not confuse the blessing with sacramental marriage.

New Ways Ministry, which advocates for LGBTQ+ Catholics, said the letter “significantly advances” efforts to make LGBTQ+ Catholics welcomed in the church and represented “one big straw towards breaking the camel’s back” in their marginalisation.

The Vatican holds that marriage is an indissoluble union between man and woman. As a result, it has long opposed gay marriage. But Francis has voiced support for civil laws extending legal benefits to same-sex spouses, and Catholic priests in parts of Europe have been blessing same-sex unions without Vatican censure.

Francis’ response to the cardinals, however, marks a reversal from the Vatican’s current official position. In an explanatory note in 2021, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith said that the church could not bless gay unions because “God cannot bless sin”.

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Neato@kbin.social 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why are there LGBT+ Catholic groups? Catholicism hates them and has since forever.

Jesus doesn't care if you're Catholic. The Golden Rule is all anyone needs to follow Jesus.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But what about the time that Jesus said "I tell you solemnly, you must hate all those who are different from you, for they steal jobs, send your nations into debt and corrupt your children. And also, I just got word from God, he says he's giving every American the right to own a gun. Not sure what that means but someone write that down because it's probably going to be important for later."

Then he turned the temple into a market and punched a bunch of poor people or something.

[–] Tammo-Korsai@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

This never gets old 🤣

[–] quindraco@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Cylusthevirus@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

wasn't that part that was misstranslated?

[–] Cylusthevirus@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The theory among some open, accepting Christians is that Paul was actually talking about the various abusive practices like pedophilia that were common among the ancient Greek peoples of the region.

The ancient and classical world was a profoundly fucked up place.

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

common among the ancient Greek peoples of the region.

the catholic church showed that pedophilia isn't common only with ancient greek sadly

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“God cannot bless sin”.

God: lmao watch me

[–] TheBiscuitLout@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

“And we specifically call this particularly entertaining sin the ol’ Vatican Reversal.”

If that doesn’t get a particularly gay sex act named after it, I’ll be disappointed.

[–] Nudding@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This just in: King of millenia old pedophile ring admits being Gay is okay I guess.

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Pedophiles have been blessed for centuries in the church, but gay people is still controversial to them

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know it’s easy to ask why LGBTQ folks would care about something like this, and I felt the same way until recently.

One of my best friends is a gay man. He was out and living a happy life until his mother got cancer and died.

He blamed himself for being gay and not religious enough for her death, so he decided to go full catholic like she was - Mass every day, prayers all the time, and become celibate, I guess, I don’t ask and we live in different states.

So for his sake, I hope this will be something positive in his life so he can stop feeling guilty and ashamed.

[–] float@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But isn't the church the reason why he feels that way in the first place?

Yeah, and I’m not excusing them. I was raised in it too and left as soon as I turned 18.

But I see lots of comments saying things like “Why would LGBTQ folks care…the church hates them, etc” and I was explaining why, at least, this one person does.

The church could spontaneously combust tomorrow and the world would be a better place for it. I’m not excusing them, I hate them…I miss my friend who has changed so much and listens to Jesus podcasts and shit and doesn’t really talk about much else. Fuck the church.

[–] mawkishdave@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As always society has to drag religions kicking and screaming to the future.

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's more the opposite, that religion was dragging society into the past.

Around 30 years after Jesus and around 5-10 before the first gospel is written, Nero, emperor of Rome, married two men. First as the wife and then as the husband.

Suddenly the gospel that's written right after it is adamant that the guy who died thirty years before this happened was all like "marriage is between a man and a woman."

So gay marriage was a thing, but then the rise and spread of Christianity with a conservative social take made it so that it wasn't for a very long time.

50 years before Jesus is born, Leucretius described natural selection and mendelian trait inheritance in surprisingly explicit detail.

The surviving copy of that book from antiquity ended up being eaten by worms in a church library until it was liberated by the secretary of the Pope bribing a monk to bring it to his Renaissance book club.

So no, it's not so much modernity dragging the church forward, it's that finally the church has temporarily lost the ability to hold modernity back.

But looking at book bans or education 'reforms' in the US south, there's certainly efforts underway to dig those claws back in.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From some other articles I’ve seen recently, it’s possible this could cause a split in the church. And if it does… good. Maybe that needs to happen for the Vatican to evolve into the modern era.

[–] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

The United Methodist church recently split over LGBTQ issues. The main branch of the church will remain progressive, but individual congregations are deciding whether to leave or stay. It is being handled well, but there are still a lot of hard feelings on both sides.

A few years ago a group pulled a surprise vote and pushed through some very conservative policies. The majority did not support them, but the process of walking them back is what caused the split.

The Vatican seems to be trying to find a middle ground on these issues. I understand why, but I wish they would just do the right thing (or, in this case, the left thing) and adopt a progressive position. It seems likely that a schism is going to happen anyway.

[–] RIPandTERROR@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Lol imagine being Catholic and having to wait as these old fucks debate to figure out if Jesus loves you or not

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah I don't get this with christians. Jesus did not seem to withhold blessings much.

[–] sebinspace@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Cool. Now don’t be theatrical, do something about the pedophiles you’re cover up for.

[–] iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why isn't this in /c/business

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Pope Francis has suggested there could be ways to bless same-sex unions, responding to five conservative cardinals who challenged him to affirm church teaching on homosexuality ahead of a big meeting where LGBTQ+ Catholics are on the agenda.

The Vatican on Monday published a letter Francis wrote to the cardinals on 11 July after receiving a list of five questions, or dubia, from them a day earlier.

But responding to the cardinals’ question about homosexual unions and blessings, he said “pastoral charity” required patience and understanding, and priests could not become judges “who only deny, reject and exclude”.

The five cardinals, all of them conservative prelates from Europe, Asia, Africa and the Americas, had challenged Francis to affirm church teaching on gay people, women’s ordination, the authority of the pope and other issues in their letter.

The signatories were some of Francis’ most vocal critics, all of them retired and of the more doctrinaire generation of cardinals appointed by St John Paul II or Pope Benedict XVI.

Brandmueller and Burke were among four signatories of a previous round of dubia to Francis in 2016 after his controversial opening to letting divorced and civilly remarried couples receive communion.


The original article contains 784 words, the summary contains 197 words. Saved 75%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not enough let them marry and deal with your pederasses

[–] Kage520@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Change takes time. Encourage more acceptance rather than being angry a small step in the right direction is too small. This would actually be a rather large step if they move forward on this!

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, has it even been legal in the states for a decade yet?

[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Easily the best pope they ever had.

[–] atk007@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Do gay people really care about being blessed by the Pope? Pedos I can imagine might have some affinity towards the Catholic church, but gays, Nah.

[–] ShroOmeric@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

He could alao bless the @%#!%+#? piece of &!?#@*%# of the #%+€!€?#&# in %)€;#%#&, for what I care about his blessings.

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] flipht@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The whole church can fuck off. But this pope is alright. This is in response to some cardinals asking him to reaffirm the church's stance on gay people. If this is what he chose to do instead, I hope he needs it up.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Credit where credit's due, he also trashtalked Trump during the first election. Basically said "he can say he's a Christian but the shit he's doing proves otherwise"

That said, he still gleefully met with him.

[–] Mamertine@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The whole church can fuck off. But this pope is alright.

The Pope is the leader of the church. Does he not have the power to simply change the church's stance regarding homosexuality?

It feels like he's paying lip service to the LGBTQ+ community, but not putting any real energy into changing anything.

[–] flipht@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Not really. He's the "first among equals" as the bishop of Rome. While this translates into a lot of power, he can't actually just make pronouncements.

Doctrine and catechism take decades to change and catch up, and any pope is largely along for that ride. This pope is using his social influence as much as possible to increase acceptance, which is why I appreciate him.

Much more than this and he will likely be assassinated. It's not super uncommon historically, and often because a pope did things a strong faction within the cardinals/bishops didn't like.

[–] ShakeThatYam@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you browse some of the catholic subreddits (not sure if they've made their way to Lemmy yet) you'll see that many conservative catholics question the legitimacy of the current Pope.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

And gay couples should tell him so.