this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
96 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

59436 readers
3376 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from !google@lemdro.id

Microsoft’s Nadella to Testify at Google Antitrust Trial Monday

By Leah Nylen and Dina Bass

October 1, 2023 at 7:00 p.m. EDT

Microsoft Corp. Chief Executive Officer Satya Nadella is set to take the stand Monday as part of the Justice Department’s antitrust trial against Google.

The DOJ has accused Alphabet Inc.’s search division of unlawfully maintaining a monopoly by paying $10 billion a year to rivals, smartphone manufacturers and wireless carriers to make its search engine the default option on mobile devices and web browsers. Google has denied the allegations.

To help prove its case, the DOJ hopes to use testimony from Nadella and other executives from Microsoft to show how even a company of its size and resources couldn’t unlock Google’s hold on the search market.

Last week, Microsoft business development executive Jonathan Tinter testified that the Redmond, Washington-based software giant failed to secure a deal to put its Bing search app on Apple’s products, even though it was willing to offer far better terms than Google and lose multiple billions of dollars on the agreement. In the end, Apple signed a fresh deal with Google.

Tinter also told the court that Microsoft’s Surface Duo smartphone was required to use Google search in order to license the Android mobile operating system and was limited from using Bing on its own devices. Nadella was personally involved in discussing some of these issues with his Google counterpart, Sundar Pichai, and will probably be asked about those conversations.

Nadella was instrumental in the development of Bing, created by Microsoft in an ultimately doomed attempt to catch up with Google and capture a chunk of the online advertising market.

While Bing has gained share on desktop computers, where it was integrated with Microsoft’s Internet Explorer and later Edge browser, it has lagged on mobile devices where people overwhelming use Google. Three or so years ago, Microsoft even discussed selling Bing to Apple, a transaction that would have replaced Google as the default option on the iPhone maker’s devices, Bloomberg reported. But a deal never came to fruition.

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PrefersAwkward@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's hilarious that Microsoft will be testifying on the antitrust behaviors of another company.

I agree Google can be taken down a few notches, but it defeats the purpose of Microsoft can't also take some spotlight over the Windows 10, 11, and Edge shenanigans.

Their whole ecosystem is built on antitrust behaviors.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 14 points 1 year ago

Make no mistake, Nadella is also trying to garner some goodwill by helping with this. He knows they'll be next, it's not even a question of "if", it's a question of "when".

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It isn't hilarious, it is just how trials go.

You can be testifying for one, and have a trail of your own in another.

One does not exclude the other.

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Let Microsoft executives testify under oath about what monopolistic behavior looks like, then subpoena their internal communications. They’re going to testify against themselves if they tell the truth under oath. If they don’t tell the truth, it’s felony perjury.

[–] realharo@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So if as a result of this, Google won't be allowed to pay to have their search engine be the default, does that mean the effective end of Mozilla?

[–] sfgifz@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If Mozilla exists only at Google's pleasure it should either reform or die. As far as Google is concerned Firefox is just a useful tool to avoid anti-competitive regulations because they can claim that an alternative browser engine that isn't directly influenced by Google exists.

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The poor CEO should then lower her 5M paycheck, which is surely deserved, given the great job she did increasing FF usage share /s.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 10 points 1 year ago

It's not (just) about paying to have Google Search as default, it's also about cases where competing offers can't go through or where they leverage other methods.

in Microsoft's case they failed even though they were willing to pay more or even provide Apple with their own search engine.

Google also holds their Android trademark and access to Google Play and Google services as a sword hanging above the heads of everybody in the Android ecosystem. Step out of line and you're effectively booted from the ecosystem.

If you like irony remember Huawei, whose ejection from the Android platform was a textbook example of how much power Google holds over OEM; but it won't come up at this trial because it was done at the request of the US government so that's OK.