this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Aotearoa / New Zealand

1648 readers
26 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general

Rules:

FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom

 

Banner image by Bernard Spragg

Got an idea for next month's banner?

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

The question really is, will our degenerate government comprised almost entirely of landlords do anything about it?

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's amazing that people find this surprising at all, who'd have thought having a stable roof over your head would make you happier?

[–] jeff11@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago

Also, state housing normally means they have the house to themselves. I'm not in a state house or owning, I'm stuck in a crowded boarding house with 10 other people. The group that I'm in always has the lowest satisfaction, I'll bet. Everyone is complaining about each other constantly, that's also how we make friends, by bitching constantly about "the indians" who never stop talking loudly, and complaining about the Chinese landlord ripping us off. I'd rather have a stable house that I don't share with others, like an apartment. NZ lives in the past. Can't believe we don't have apartments in the suburbs of christchurch yet..........

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

State housing is like winning lotto you get a house for dirt cheap. Of course you are going to be happier than the sucker paying $700 a week for the same thing.

[–] Xcf456@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

State housing is like winning lotto

Only because we haven't built enough of them for decades. This is why we should build much more of them

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago

No! We need to crack down on beneficiaries! We need less state housing! The free market will do a better job at...

Sorry, I can't keep going. I was going to end with a /s but I just can't do it.

[–] Xcf456@lemmy.nz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think it's surprising, but good research to have backing this up nonetheless. Pretty much every problem in this country can be traced back to the lack of affordable and stable housing. It makes complete sense to me that a state house with security of tenure comes out better than a private rental you know you have for a year at most (and likely less if no cause evictions come back).

Incidentally, the authors of this study have done a lot of research into housing quality too. They found that providing insulation grants for our notoriously cold and damp houses generated savings many times the cost due to less pressure on the health system and fewer sick days from school and work.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Housing co-ops, too. There are solutions that don't require us to drag capitalists out into the street and shoot them!

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But that's the fun part...

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

You're not wrong, but having housing is also fun. Easier to take a day off work to go guillotine billionaires when you're not giving all your money to those same billionaires.

[–] KhanumBallZ@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago

If anyone wants to put money toward buying a plot of land, and filling it up with tiny houses - with a giant community farm - I'm down!