this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
308 points (97.5% liked)

News

23649 readers
3044 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Senate passed a resolution Wednesday to make business attire a requirement on the Senate floor.

The moves comes after backlash to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer's (D-N.Y.) directive to scuttle the chamber's informal dress code, which was widely viewed to be inspired by Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.).

The bipartisan resolution requires that business attire be worn on the floor of the Senate, "which for men shall include a coat, tie, and slacks or other long pants."

The bill does not spell out what the attire includes for women.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aidinthel@reddthat.com 213 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm so glad the country doesn't have any actual problems that need to be addressed so the Senate can afford to spend time on nonsense like this.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I think you hit the nail on the head with that one. We're facing another Republican engineered government shutdown but what's the #1 priority? Fashion.

[–] theotherone@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago

I’m starting to think they also don’t want to see his arm tats that honor victims of gun violence. That would be another crisis unaddressed.

[–] Hotdogman@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That doesn't mention female attire...

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

25 senators are women 15 of whom are Democrats (and 1 independent who caucuses with the Democrats) and it was a unanimous vote. Isn't that peculiar?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 139 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, let's enforce a classist dress code to remind everyone how classist we are. That'll fix everything.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It certainly makes it more likely for the rich to be able to go to the senate. Especially if you're an especially big and tall guy like Fetterman who would have to get all of his suits tailor-made.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yeah it’s basically an attempt to be like the House of Lords in a country without nobility

[–] Spendrill@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

You might not have a nobility but you've sure as shit got an aristocracy. Cabots, Lowells, Hearsts, Kennedys...

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch 18 points 1 year ago

It's the Senate, it's intended to be the "upper class."

The rabble is supposed to be in the House of Representatives.

[–] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 103 points 1 year ago (14 children)

The tie is the most useless piece of clothing ever invented. It serves no purpose (shut up about the original function, it no longer serves it) except to constrict your airway and dip into your spaghett.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 37 points 1 year ago

It serves no purpose

Autoerotic asphyxiation.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What was even the original function anyway?

[–] JdW@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To please King Louis XIII.

During the 30 year war, Croatian mercenaries fought alongside the King in battle. To keep their jackets tied they used a piece of cloth which King Louis XIII took a strong liking to. He made this smart scarf a mandatory accessory for royal gatherings. Paying homage to the Croats who introduced this scarf to him, he named it ‘La Cravate’, which is still the French name for the necktie today.

Over the ages, the cravat has evolved into the modern necktie we wear today. Since their origins in military regiments, they have been a symbol of power and respect. Throughout the 19th century, they swept through the Western world. They were found in most universities, schools, sports clubs and gentlemen clubs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lateraltwo@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

The original function of any dress code is always maintained by the aristocracy and adopted by the people to put on the same airs, never the other way around.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 93 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sure, cause the ex president with the most federal charges is in business attire and he is an upstanding citizen. Let’s focus on how people look instead of actual issues.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's only ever about appearances with the repubs. They want the appearance of propriety. If they start dressing like their lessers, then The lessers might realize they are equals.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bstix@feddit.dk 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Even trump might be out of code, unless high heels are acceptable business attire for men.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 73 points 1 year ago (15 children)

This is what's important to these people. They don't care about millions suffering every day, they don't care about the climate going to shit, they don't care about the economy. They're up in arms because someone might not wear a full suit in their presence. These are your "representatives".

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Delusional@lemmy.world 68 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How about instead of making sure they wear the correct clothing, you make sure they do their god damn fucking job of making life better for the citizens. Because that hasn't been happening for decades now and what they wear while fucking over Americans hardly matters.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago

This is the dumbest fucking thing

[–] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 64 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Ah yes formal business attire, the universal dress code for those who accomplish nothing while looking very important. Very appropriate

Ya know gym shorts and a t-shirt besides being infinitely more practical and comfortable would lead to confusion with actual hard working Americans who don't have the luxury of getting paid to do nothing.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Good thing they're focusing on the important things. Fucking Cunts!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 57 points 1 year ago

Sure seems like they've got a lot of free time over there...

[–] mill_city@lemmy.zip 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Gotta look profesh while they're not doing their jobs. It's like they're in competition with that disaster of a House to see which chamber can be the most useless.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Imagine a world without conservatives. Immense wastes of energy and time like this would be a thing of the past.

Conservatism is a disease in need of a cure.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 year ago (10 children)

If I was Fetterman, it'd now be my personal pet peeve to subvert this dress code whenever I could by showing up in the most ridiculous-but-formally-correct outfits.

[–] SheDiceToday@eslemmy.es 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yellow ties, mustard green coat, orange slacks?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

Glad they are focused on the important things.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 45 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Why only men have specific requirements? This is not an attack on women but the ridiculousness of having a dress code that only specifies one gender.

I would go the malicious compliance route.

“which for men shall include a coat, tie, and slacks or other long pants.”

First up, there is no mention of a shirt...

Coat (n): A sleeved outer garment extending from the shoulders to the waist or below.

Lots of room for fun there.

Tie: (from wikkipedia) Variants include the ascot, bow, bolo, zipper tie, cravat, and knit.

Again, lots of fun.

slacks or other long pants

You get the idea by now.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Honestly something along what you're suggesting was my first thought too but then that might hurt Fetterman when he runs for reelection. He beat Dr Oz by 3%, which is rather good, but Oz was a pretty terrible candidate. He might face significantly stiffer competition next time around and he probably wants to avoid a montage of him dressed silly on some attack ad.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Sir I must let you know that you are impugning upon the good reputation of cunts everywhere.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 35 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Theater is the only thing U.S. Senate is good at. And maybe getting bribed, but that's beside the point.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] TruTollTroll@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So glad they can decide on what to wear instead fixing things to prevent a government shut down ..... phew I was so worried about their priorities there for a moment 😕

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Wahots@pawb.social 34 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Pass a budget. Nobody should be getting paid until then. The 20 republican extremists holding the entire country hostage should be fined exorbitantly every day they refuse to work with everyone to pass a budget.

Fuck stuff like dress codes. I could give less of a shit if everyone was naked, literally doesn't matter vs getting the government properly funded.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is going to help avert a Government shutdown and put millions of people out of work!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 year ago

Crisis averted! Good job senators! I know I'll sleep better now!

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 year ago

Who cares what people are wearing?

[–] Binthinkin@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago

40 something and still dealing with dumb shits in office.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Seems blatantly discriminatory on the basis of gender

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

These people don't know what the country needs and they don't care. They spend their time and our money making it illegal for people to dress in a way that makes them unhappy. Absolutely fucking useless.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

This is pure classism. They think they are better than us.

[–] scripthook@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

I think lawmakers getting paid during a government shutdown, free healthcare, and only work half the year is more concerning. They get more breaks than I get vacation time at work.

[–] Overzeetop@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And the penalty is what - a letter in your personal file? A fine (and to be paid by whom, if paid at all)? A physical removal from the space (and, again, by whom)? DJT and the modern GOP have shown that laws written concerning the presidency, congress, and the supreme court have no teeth whatsoever. Even congressional subpoenas and perjury no longer have any meaning as long as you're willing to ignore or flaunt them.

I actually agree with the desire for at least a minimum of decorum in the chambers, but the whole process is stupid to the extreme.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Kinda weird they had to pass a resolution to overrule Schumer's non-resolution decision, but they did it by unanimous consent so if Schumer (or Fetterman) disagreed they could have stopped it. If Schumer and Fetterman are on board for this, they could have just reversed the earlier decision.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

popularity contest for the upper class

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Literally cannot pass a budget on time for decades though.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›