this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
72 points (96.2% liked)

politics

19103 readers
4081 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Senate Republicans aren’t outright defending indicted Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) as he faces bribery and corruption charges. But they're not joining the dozen-plus Democratic senators who have called on him to resign.

"That's an issue for the Democrats to deal with," Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell told reporters Wednesday when asked whether or not Menendez should resign.

Between the lines, there are several reasons for this. Let's start with the biggest one: The enemy you know is — generally — better than the one you don’t. The Senate GOP knows that, and its members largely see Menendez as a moderate Democrat who led the Foreign Affairs Committee in a cooperative manner.

In addition to his subject-matter expertise, Republicans appreciate that he's a steadfast supporter of Israel (the American Israel Public Affairs Committee has come to Menendez's defense).

“He certainly knows the issues well, and he's a hawk,” said Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.), who's gone further than McConnell and urged Menendez to spurn calls to resign. “I mean, that's the thing for Republicans, having a Democrat who is so hawkish as a chairman is kind of an encouragement.”

Menendez has stepped down as chair of the Foreign Relations panel; Senate Democrats’ bylaws required him to do so. But if he was acquitted and still around, he could, in theory, take the post back.

Then there's electoral politics: If Menendez did step aside, New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy (D-N.J.) would be free to appoint a successor. With progressives like Rep. Andy Kim (D-N.J.) already eyeing the seat, there’s a chance a newer New Jersey Democrat could be less of an ally to the Senate middle.

Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) has vocally criticized Democrats for calling on Menendez to resign. He suggested that the reason Senate Democrats are calling on Menendez to resign — which they didn't do in 2015, when Menendez got hit with another indictment — is because the politics are more convenient now.

“Democrats stood firm by Bob Menendez eight years ago. Difference is they've got New Jersey legislative elections that are at risk. They've got a lot of Democratic senators up for reelection who are at risk. And they now have a Democratic governor of New Jersey to appoint Bob Menendez's replacement, as opposed to Chris Christie eight years ago," Cotton told POLITICO.

His line of thinking alludes to another reality for the Senate GOP: If Menendez were to run again and somehow clinched the nomination, he could help Senate Republicans try to put blue New Jersey in play next year.

Then there's the comparison risk: Republicans have their own indicted colleagues to be concerned about as they weigh their approach to Menendez. Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) is facing significant fraud charges, yet the majority of Republicans have not called on him to resign. Former President Donald Trump, the GOP's presidential frontrunner, has been indicted four times, though Republicans have continued to stand behind him.

Speaker Kevin McCarthy, for one, this week seemed to flip-flop on whether Menendez should resign after a reporter mentioned Santos. While McCarthy over the weekend sounded ready to say Menendez should step down, he later clarified that both Santos and Menendez should have their days in court first. (The obvious subtext: McCarthy needs Santos in office, casting his vote to support the slim GOP majority.)

What to watch: Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer Wednesday declined to call on Menendez to resign. More than half of Senate Democrats say he should. Menendez will be addressing the Senate Democratic caucus Thursday, however, and Schumer said "we'll see what happens after that."

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fubo@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gotta keep the corrupt Democrat around to point to, just so people know there was one once.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Illinois has entered the chat.

[–] halfempty@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

GOP have no criticism of Menendez, because corruption is business as usual for them.

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

McCarthy actually called for Menendez to resign. Then a reporter asked if that meant that Santos should resign since he too is under indictment. Suddenly, McCarthy was pro-"Menendez should have his day in court."

[–] TinyPizza@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Republican solidarity = Cousins in crime

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Shitbirds of a feather.