this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
219 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

34894 readers
572 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] demonen@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Water accused of being wet in lawsuit" next, I guess.

[–] xilophor@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But is water wet? πŸ€”

[–] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Does it have water on it?

[–] philycheezestake@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] PuppyOSAndCoffee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Whaaa? The web service provider?

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] wagoner@infosec.pub 6 points 1 year ago

"Khaaaaaaaaaaaaaan!!"

[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Amazon? Nah that can't be.

[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Amazon and google? Great news indeed. A shame the google one is mostly done in secret

[–] gastationsushi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Fuck these judges rigging the system in favor of monopolies.

That google judge was very concerned disclosing earnings would reveal company secrets so they allowed google to hide them in the trial. But they are publicly traded and required to disclose earnings...

[–] fox@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

In a partially redacted 172-page complaint, the FTC alleges that Amazon implemented an algorithm β€œfor the express purpose of deterring other online stores from offering lower prices.”

Any idea why it would be redacted?