this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
87 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2380 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Speaker Kevin McCarthy is struggling to pass a bill to fund the government — and the White House isn’t about to throw him a lifeline.

With just days to go before the government runs out of money, Biden’s team is watching Congress steam toward a shutdown, resigned to the reality that there’s little they can do now to fix the situation and confident the politics will play out their way.

President Joe Biden has steered well clear of the chaos engulfing the House, where Republicans are battling each other over a government funding bill. Within the White House, aides have settled on a hard-line strategy aimed at pressuring McCarthy to stick to a spending deal he struck with Biden back in May rather than attempt to patch together a new bipartisan bill.

“We agreed to the budget deal and a deal is a deal — House GOP should abide by it,” said a White House official granted anonymity to discuss the private calculations. Their “chaos is making the case that they are responsible if there is a shutdown.”

Biden world’s wait-and-see approach comes against the backdrop of an increasingly likely shutdown, which would be the first of the Biden era.

On Tuesday, GOP leadership canceled plans for a procedural vote on a short term funding bill, wary it had the numbers to pass. Hours later, hard-right conservatives tanked a procedural vote related to a defense spending bill. Moderate House Democrats have been working on a last-ditch fall back option to avert a shutdown, but any final product will need approval from the Senate.

For now, the White House is staying out of the mix, trying instead to draw a contrast between the House majority that can’t complete the task of keeping the government’s lights on and Biden, who on Tuesday addressed the United Nations General Assembly in New York. It’s also highlighting the price of the latest GOP plan, such as, in their estimation, cutting 800 Customs and Border Protection agents and 110,000 Head Start positions for children.

The administration has hitched its wagon to a Senate effort widely supported by members of both parties in that chamber. The top Republican and Democratic appropriators are working on long-term, bipartisan funding bills that adhere to the agreed upon spending levels, although they have accepted that a stop-gap funding bill will be needed. There is a sense in the White House and on Capitol Hill that support for the Senate bill would increase if it becomes evident that McCarthy can’t steer his conference.

Getting involved now, White House officials reasoned, would only lend credibility to an attempt by conservative lawmakers to effectively rip up the Biden-McCarthy deal agreed to during debt ceiling talks in the spring and extract deeper cuts from the administration. It also would risk further angering progressives, who already didn’t like the funding levels in that spring agreement.

“The White House is there. The House Democrats are there, and the Senate Democrats and Republicans,” said Rep. Rosa Delauro (D-Conn.), the Democrats’ top appropriator. “It’s just this recalcitrant group of House Republicans.”

The administration is not entirely hands off, though. Senior administration officials, chiefly OMB Director Shalanda Young, have been in touch with lawmakers in both chambers and parties.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why would anyone want to play ball with the GOP? It's clear that they will throw anyone and everyone under the bus to get what they want. Why help the drowning man who will only pull you in to try and escape with your wallet?

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

And it's not even like there's one GOP to deal with. You have the MAGA Freedom Caucus who don't seem to have any actual budgetary goals beyond "give us everything we want or we'll burn it all down - and we might just burn it all down anyway!"

Then there's the rest of the GOP who might not agree with MAGA, but cowers in fear of them and refuses to speak up against them. (At least, until they retire. Then, they suddenly grow spines and speak out.)

Theoretically, the Democrats could come to a deal with the non-MAGA Republicans, but they're too busy shaking in fear of the MAGA Republicans calling them traitors and RINOs.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

"C'mon man, we were just funnin' ya! This time we won't cheat, I promise!"
- knocks over the goalpost just in time for the ball to bounce off the edge -

"What the fuck was that?! I told you, this is my fucking ball so I make the rules and the rules say you can't score a fucking goal no matter what! I'd hate for you to break my rules or else I might have to do something unreasonable like rob your grandparents and starve all the neighborhood children."
- shoves the ball into your stomach, knocking the wind out of you -

- shouting even though everyone is nearby -
"Ok, since Brandon can't seem to remember the rules, I'm going to have to change them again! Now we all ARE going to rob our grandparents and starve the neighborhood children. Anyone who doesn't like it is gay! Oh yeah, and grooms kids!"

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

Why throw them a lifeline? Earlier this year, McCarthy and Biden made a deal on the budget to avert a default. Now McCarthy has to uphold his end of the bargain- it's his job to pass a budget in-line with what he and Biden agreed to.

[–] crypticthree@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When people are negotiating in bad faith, don't negotiate.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 year ago

I've been yelling this in my brain since Obama. Actually, before that as well, just Obama was when the voice in my head became noticeably louder.

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sen. John Fetterman: "If those jagoffs in the House stop trying to shut our government down, and fully support Ukraine, then I will save democracy by wearing a suit on the Senate floor next week."

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then he wears a tan suit and they get triggered all over again

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let Fetterman Be Fetterman

[–] norbert@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Don't fetter the man.

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

Tsk Tsk, he's holding Democracy hostage to protect his own personal hobbyhorses.

[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks Politico, this article added exactly nothing to the conversation.

Next it’ll be: “parents decline to negotiate with toddler who wants to take the safety covers off all the electrical outlets.”

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're reporting on what's happening. They're not supposed to be adding to the conversation.

[–] darkmatterstyx@lemmy.fmhy.net 3 points 1 year ago

Too many people have forgotten that news is only supposed to be facts. The rest is just opinion and entertainment.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s also highlighting the price of the latest GOP plan, such as, in their estimation, cutting 800 Customs and Border Protection agents and 110,000 Head Start positions for children.

OK, that they hate children, especially poor children, is nothing new. But how do they expect to reduce illegal immigration when they cut down on border protection agents? I mean, they are not smart, but that should be something that even they realize, shouldn't it?

[–] holmesandhoatzin 5 points 1 year ago

Because then they can scream about open borders knowing that their base is either too dumb to know or doesn't want to know the truth.