this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
277 points (94.0% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3987 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The candid reviews of the new rules, which went into effect Monday, even included mockery from Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, who joked to reporters that she planned to “wear a bikini” on Tuesday.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 158 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Susan “I believe the president has learned his lessons” Collins will have to wear bikini with pearl necklace, just to clutch the pearls at every GOP hypocrisy

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] muse@kbin.social 131 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can't wear hoodies and shorts but crickets about giving handjobs and vaping around children

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Technically, that was in the House of Representatives, but your point stands

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 16 points 1 year ago

Technically, the perp is in the House, silence is still coming from both House and Senate GOP.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 128 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Ultimately in a democracy I want my representation to feel like a representation of folks like me. If you want to wear a suit to work that’s great, but maybe us rust belt democrats want someone who’d rather dress like a union steward to go represent our interests. Senator Fetterman in his hoodie looks exactly like the sort of person you’d expect to represent Pennsylvanians.

Also maybe just maybe, I care more about the quality of their work than what they wear doing it.

[–] Specific_Skunk@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My industry has largely moved to uniforms. I say we get them all coveralls and be done with it. It’s a job, not a fashion show.

[–] CobraChicken@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Add flairs of their biggest donors to the overalls

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago

Also maybe just maybe, I care more about the quality of their work than what they wear doing it.

I wish I could get someone to explain this to my boss. Me wearing a collared shirt on camera isn't going to make me do a better job, and if you think that then you don't know what the hell I'm doing all day.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 101 points 1 year ago

So wear a fucking bikini. You'll be the one looking like an idiot, not Fetterman.

[–] DrPop@lemmy.one 97 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is peak ok Boomer here.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 28 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Nah. You can't blame this one on boomers. It's fascism.

Fascists just love uniforms! Want to get them all excited? Tell them you want to plan a military parade where everyone has to wear their fanciest dress uniforms and march alongside tanks!

[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It makes it easier to tell who is part of the in group and who is part of the out group. It also helps in establishing control over people.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 71 points 1 year ago

I mean, in fairness, have you seen how Fetterman fits into a suit and tie? He makes anything look like a hoodie and shorts. I don't mean that as a perjorative, they just don't make suits his size unless you want your Senator buying $5,000 tailored suits. Or worse... getting $5,000 tailored suits donated to them from special interests.

[–] ViewSonik@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Again… this was the predictable response from republicans. They also failed to remember that they had a literal orange clown in the oval office for a few days over the course of 2016-2020. So they themselves set the precedent

[–] smallaubergine@kbin.social 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I find it funny that they call the democrats "coastal elites" and then are so up in arms when the "coastal elites" try and make things less "elite"

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It makes perfect sense if you predefine literally everything a Democrat does as "wrong."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Literally championing style over substance.

Suits are costumes. The point is to make people look classy and dignified even if they're actually skeevy assholes.

Genuinely classy and dignified people look it no matter what they're wearing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kethal@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (4 children)

"I think there is a certain dignity that we should be maintaining in the Senate" - Susan Collins

" ... she planned to 'wear a bikini' on Tuesday." - also Susan Collins.

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mean she said 'I think he learned his lesson' about Trump and the impeachment, she isn't exactly a goldmine of truth and honesty. I bet she doesn't even wear a bikini, I'd have more respect for her if she did.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

There are greater issues than chiding her for using obvious hyperbole to emphasize the point she's previously made.

There are also greater issues senators should focus on than what senators wear, like literally solving any problem.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DigitalFrank@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Damn, I was hoping that quote was from Mitch McConnell.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

This would have been such an obvious slam-dunk for Republicans! Their base hates suits and ties (and the people who wear them). They could have started wearing blue jeans and sleeveless shirts and work boots to the Senate floor, but no, they need to feel like their jobs are important.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fetterman looks more like the Republican base than anyone in Congress

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Senator, any veneer of decorum and seriousness went out the door when Cruz read Dr. Seuss on the floor.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Really? I thought it was when they were showing revenge porn of Hunter Biden

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hasherm0n@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Fuckin do it, be free

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

If anything, not wanting to people to have more autonomy is very on brand

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

She's a rotten stupid Cunt.

[–] deft@ttrpg.network 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

do it I'll toss that pic into an ai undresser! callin your bluff

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Trashcanman@lemmynsfw.com 24 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I think they should all be nude. Both the house and the senate. I’m serious about that. People can joke about shriveled dicks and sagging breasts but eliminating clothing altogether would help to eliminate a lot of the partisan nonsense

[–] SlowNoPoPo@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fuck that they should wear Jumpers covered by their campaign doners

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago

All form, zero substance with these people.

[–] candyman337@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You know you've been in office too long when you're complaining about a laxer dress code

[–] athos77@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

Oh, it feeds in perfectly with their incredible uproar over Obama's "tan suit".

[–] demonquark@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Go for it. I double dare you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

“But the corporate class might withdraw their sponsorship if we don’t all wear their traditional attire!”

[–] llama@midwest.social 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Go for it, anything for the right to be taken less seriously than the left is a win.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

I can wear hoodies and shorts to my job too and it's great. Good for Fetterman.

[–] Treczoks@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

Feel free to do it. You'll freeze your ass off and be the laughing stock of the country.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Will she not just fuck off to the great beyond?

[–] spez@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago (5 children)

“I think there is a certain dignity that we should be maintaining in the Senate, and to do away with the dress code, to me, debases the institution,” Collins added.

Now can a man not have even his hoodie fellas?

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

I'd bet a lot of money some conservative said something similar about "certain dignity" when the first woman senator was elected.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] bookmeat@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

This just means they can now openly wear their swastika pins.

[–] HWK_290@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

“We be styling,” Tester said. “I don’t think it changes anything for me.”

Who gives a shit? As long as you're not indecent, wear what is comfortable

*opposition brought to you from the people who claim workers are dying to go back the office

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

She brings up a good point.

Why should she be allowed to make decisions?

[–] shadowspirit@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Wish she held such strong opinions as she voted to confirm the current Supreme Court.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 year ago

How unfortunate, shes still here.

“I think there is a certain dignity that we should be maintaining in the Senate, and to do away with the dress code, to me, debases the institution,” Collins added.

Oh Susan…that ship has sailed, boo.

load more comments
view more: next ›