Using computational photography to create focal length modes is actually pretty clever
this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
37 points (91.1% liked)
Apple
17494 readers
97 users here now
Welcome
to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!
Rules:
- No NSFW Content
- No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
- No Ads / Spamming
Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread
Communities of Interest:
Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple
Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode
Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
“we bring in in a kind of very kind of thoughtful and specific way, the pixels from the 48 megapixels to basically do a detail transfer,” he says.
What the fuck did he say
Detail transfer is something you get by shooting at a higher resolution and then downscaling.
For example a typical 4k camera will produce a 1080p image that looks significantly more detailed than a 1080p (native) camera (there’s a lot of hand waving here about resolution and lenses but let’s just ignore it all for the sake of the question to on ).
Sort of like how 35mm films transferred to VHS always looked so much sharper with more detail than video shot on VHS-quality equipment.
There’s a lot to unpack here but hopefully it’s enough to kickstart clarifying what they’re talking about.
ProRes files, and specifically 4K at 60p requires an attached SSD. All other video modes and all photos captured can only be saved to the iPhone first and then transferred later.
They just purposefully annoy us don’t they. They have to upsell that storage no matter what.
It seems so arbitrary. Since their developers have already done the legwork to make it work for that specific use-case you could assume that it would be relatively easy to implement it for pretty much everything.
I thought the whole reason for the iPhone 15 having usb2.0 was because it’s using last years chip. Last years chip also had a usb 2.0 controller. I don’t understand why everybody’s freaking out about this
People just looking for sky to yell at ;)
They want customers to run out of space. Their storage upsells are ridiculous and they love recurring subscriptions with hard to remove data.
If you’re a professional shooting 4K 60 ProRes video you likely have the budget to upgrade the storage (or shoot with a real professional grade camera.) it’s highly unlikely you could have a good user experience with 128GB (minus the OS and all your other personal garbage) filling up in minutes shooting in this mode. The lower capacity models aren’t designed for those specific use cases in mind, and it’s cool they’ve found a way around that limitation through the use of external attached storage.
Yes obviously. It’s usb storage not an innovation. Now let every app write anything to it instead of milking users for only storage where Apple gets a cut... It is gross.
Every app can write anything to external storage this has existed for a while for the iPad and 3rd party apps.
Apple is making a cheaper, lower capacity option with the ability to add your own unrestricted storage and you complain about… nothing really.
You completely ignored what Apple just said.
They artificially refuse to support the Camera writing to external storage.
Great, an SD slot with extra steps (and probably intentional compatibility issues with non-Apple disks).