this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
237 points (95.4% liked)

Android

28002 readers
261 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.ml


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Next thing to be killed by Google in 3, 2, 1...

[–] CanofBeanz@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This is why for the first time in my life I ordered an iPhone. My domains being sold off to squarespace was the final straw for me.

[–] puppy@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To be fair, telling customers to "just buy a new one" is standard Apple practice.

[–] sirfancy@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Apple literally invented that move. I can understand being frustrated with Google's track record for support, but if you are switching to Apple in hopes of them being more pro-consumer, I got some bad news for ya.

[–] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Apple support and provide software updates for iPhones for 7 years. There’s plenty to hate about Apple but they’ve pretty much got the longest support for devices in the mobile industry.

I’d love to know more vendors who support their devices for longer than 7 years.

[–] TheOriginalGregToo@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They also purposely build their devices in such a way that they often can't be economically repaired, necessitating a repurchase. Check out Louis Rossman on YouTube, he owns a repair shop and rants about it all the time.

[–] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ve literally just got my phone back from a local phone repair shop (repairing my iPhone) and it’s Samsungs my repair person rants about (the Z and S models they mentioned in particular). They fixed my iPhone same day while I waited.

Looking at iFixit scores, that seems to track. Samsungs seem to get 2/10 to 4/10, Apple get 6/10s. Google Pixel 7 seems to get slated everywhere for taking the longest to repair.

Phones in general seem to be awful to repair but I do not see iPhones as any worse than the current trends of unrepairable flip phones or phones with flimsy components like the Pixel 7 rear camera glass.

[–] puppy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Can you share the Pixel 7 repairability score from iFixit? I couldn't find one.

I did find a glowing review from Hugh Jeffreys, another respected repair channel in YouTube.

https://youtu.be/yIiRc97DOU8?si=SNEQ-0SMX9ksn2ak

[–] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

They didn’t publish one for some reason but you can garner a strong idea but just looking at the difficulty scores and time each type of repair takes.

[–] puppy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

l'd love to know more vendors who support their devices for longer than 7 years.

Fairphone

[–] Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Didn’t they announce that they would support their phone for 6 years, not 7?

[–] puppy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That was the old support standard. From this year onwards, new models will be supported for 8 years (5 year Android updates + 3 year security updates).

[–] Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Damn… that is nice! I do hope they get their battery life and camera in better shape, then they will be a real good alternative to most other phones.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

To be fair here... Apple doesn't repair Apple Watches either. If you have AppleCare they still just replace it with a refurbished unit.

Google doesn't even have a similar program though.

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Apple does repair watches. It’s limited to the two biggest things, the glass and the battery. Anything else and they just replace it and tear down the old one for resources.

Smartwatches in general are hard to repair but Apples service is miles ahead of anyone else.

[–] BigVault@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be honest, I’d prefer they did that.

Faster turnaround for the consumer and the old unit get put into the pool for the next refurb.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

100% agreed. Repair or replacement to be honest makes no difference for me. Having repaired phones, tablets, etc. in retail for years (both OEM certified for Apple, Samsung, LG, etc. and third party) there is often no way to properly repair things like a device frame which can prevent a good screen from being installed correctly.

The fact they don't have that as an option at all is a major issue.

[–] yildo@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are refurbished units not the result of a repair?

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are, but your average person thinks of the two entirely separate.

Many people feel a refurbished device is inherently messed up and they don't want to accept a refurbished unit as a replacement for their USED and DAMAGED device. They want the one thing repaired in store and their same device back. No matter what. Even when that's simply not reasonable for practical.

I've done phone, tablet, and computer repair for over 15 years now, both OEM certified (including Apple) and entirely third party. For some people the distinction between getting their same watch back with a new screen and a refurbished replacement is massive. Even though that refurb replacement likely was a small repair as well, just something not really field repairable.

For companies like Apple, some repairs they don't do in the field only because of the time it would take. Or the part they send for those in a retail location is a full assembly instead of just what needs to be fixed.

Button not working on your phone? For many companies, they aren't going to strip that phone down and replace the button ribbon, even though that is a separate part. Those ribbon connections are often routed under the battery and around the frame. It would take an hour to disassemble and make that repair. Not feasible for a retail repair environment. If they repair it at all, they would instead just replace the entire housing with many of those small components already installed, which is a much more expensive part, but faster. In most cases though the manufacturers would instead just replace the device for time consuming repairs like that, and the device would then be refurbished at a warehouse where they can take the time for an in depth repair like that.

[–] pete@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

This is crazy to me because a refurb unit is tested every time.

The don't test every device off the line, but when someone hands them a watch and says,' I broke this'. They actually go through a whole test suite to validate that it's been fixed and works properly.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but from my experience, a large amount of people aren't very logical when it comes to electronics. Many people still seem to view it all as black magic that should just work 100% of the time and be indestructible.

It doesn't help that for some companies, QA on refurb devices is pretty sloppy. Almost no major company runs their own manufacturing or refurbishment systems, they're all contracted out and the contractors do the bare minimum required by the contract and many things simply aren't done or are missed even if they're supposed to be checked.

Yeah, I've bought most of my gaming consoles refurbished. Only one to break down on me was the PS2

[–] uglyduckling81@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This is one of the weirdest statements I've ever read.

I don't like the repair policy of this company so I'm switching to Apple......

Tell me you live in a dark cave without telling me you live in a dark cave.

[–] youngalfred@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I think the difference is that Apple products can be repaired, as parts are plentiful for third party repairers and apple will also repair it (for a premium).

The article is saying how no-one, not even Google, can repair a pixel watch as there were no spare parts produced.

Edit: I understand their repair policies re MacBook repair shops etc, but for a consumer being told that even the manufacturer can't do anything is a bit galling and cause for reflection on future purchases.

[–] verity_kindle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Thank you for helping with a drill down on that comment, instead of making fun of the commenter. You are lawful neutral. Keep up the good work.

[–] puppy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

think the difference is that Apple products can NOT be repaired

There, fixed it for you.

I recommend that you watch Louis Rossmann on YouTube. He regularly presents how Apple prohibit repairs by third parties either by adding software locks to simple parts, prohibiting parts contractors from selling spare parts, donating to anti-repair lobbying group among many other practices.

Migrating to Apple because Google didn't repair a product is a very weird move. Both of those companies are to be blamed, but Apple much more in my instances.

[–] youngalfred@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

But the point of the article is that the watch literally can't be repaired - no first or third party can do it.

But I can get any apple watch repaired. Yes they are scummy about third party, but apple will gladly repair it for money.

I can understand the shift.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] insaneduck@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I think he is talking about google’s habit of closing services rather than repairability.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

When have Apple declared they can’t repair a currently supported/sold device?

[–] GrayBoltWolf@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Same here. Not sure why but being told all my domains were being sold to squarespace really pushed me over as well.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

This is why I never invest in any Google product. They have a terrible track record of killing a project months after it was released.

[–] Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Take them to court. Completely unavoidable amount of waste. C'mon

[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What happened to the right to repair in the EU?

[–] troutsushi@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

The Commission transmitted a proposal to the European Parliament. The Parliament and the European Council have to discuss and pass the proposal for it to go into effect.

Official info site of the European Commission

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigVault@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I’m so close to going pixel again but stuff like this really bothers me.

I’d hope that if they did exchange the watch, they’d at least refurb the broken one that was handed in.

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Exchange?

Google doesn’t have a program for that, and they’ve already said accidental damage isn’t covered by warranty.

So if you crack your screen, it’s entirely on you to just buy a full new one. You could turn it in for recycling, sure. But that wouldnt go be be refurbished. Most companies don’t do their own refurbishment, and the pixel watch does not any parts available to it outside of manufacture.

[–] flipht@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Every pixel product I have had was fine when I got it, but Google just won't commit to support its products in any reasonable way.

I've never had similar issues with Samsung.

[–] skymtf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 year ago

Oooof, its kinda sad given pixels are some of the few devices with an unlockable bootloader.

[–] jetsetdorito@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

I'm still upset about my OnHub, really nice routers but essentially bricks now if it's not already set up.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is why I love my Watch 6

[–] maniajack@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Is it worth it if you don't have a samsung phone?

[–] SGHFan@lemdro.id 5 points 1 year ago

Very anti right-to-repair. Remember that Google has an iFixit partnership.

[–] robbi67@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I like this watch face. Does anybody know where I can find it?

load more comments
view more: next ›