Seems like a good idea, though I've been impressed with how stable Tumbleweed somehow manages to be. I have been running it for months now without a single problem, even though it receives updates several times a week.
this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
146 points (98.0% liked)
Linux
48003 readers
1108 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Apparently they get their software tested via OpenQA which manages to remove most issues bsfore they hit users.
Yeah, it's a good idea but I don't think I'll be moving from Tumbleweed.
Actually this might be the release model that suits me the most. I want relatively uptodate releases but not new updates 2-3 times a week.
I wonder if there could be a system in place that is just Tumbleweed but with an user facing option from when to update. Like, on my machine I could use an update per week, but on someone's machine they might just need it once per month. With bug fixes and major DE versions ignoring this limit, or something similar.
You can update Tumbleweed once a week, or even once a month without problem. I think the added value of Slowroll is rather slower, hopefully even more consolidated QA no?
Sounds cool. I have my dad on Tumbleweed, because I wanted to avoid big upgrades, but needing to download hundreds of packages every week is quite pointless for him...
I like the linked Jonathan Corbet LWN article.
The results are somewhat ambiguous. On the one hand, there seems to be a significant portion of the community that would prefer to keep Leap going in something close to its current form. On the other, though, there is also a lot of interest in rolling distributions, which are almost the opposite of how the core of Leap is managed. [...]
After looking at the survey responses, Brown came to a few conclusions regarding where, in his opinion, the openSUSE community should focus its efforts. By his reading, the respondents "overwhelmingly" support rolling releases; as a result, he said, any Leap replacement should look like Slowroll rather than Linarite. "It is the most popular with our users, and the option more closely aligned to what our contributors use themselves." (emphasis mine)
Hahaha. Good old Richard!
(I personally like the idea of Slowroll though. I hated when openSUSE stopped providing the GNOME:Next repos for Leap. Otoh, I am no longer using openSUSE anyway.)
Is there a way to migrate from Tumbleweed to this new "Slowroll" thing without reinstalling? Like could I just update my zypper repos or something?
I like the concept. I've been rolling tumbleweed for a while with no issues except for Nvidia drivers, but combining the stability of a point release with the "install once" feature of a rolling release is nice.
OS Leap and Debian do a solid job with release upgrades, but applications can get out of date when you're getting close to the next release.
Same here. Nvidia troubles were one the main reasons I jumped ship from Tumbleweed.
I'm a little surprised at the focus on "install once", because I kind of thought my negative distupgrade experiences were a "me" problem. Honestly, I can't remember the last time I had a successful major upgrade on Linux. Totally nuked an Ubuntu install trying to upgrade from 20.04. Now I take major upgrades as an opportunity to hop distros again.
I kind of thought my negative distupgrade experiences were a “me” problem.
I mean I will say I've never had a failed distribution upgrade, so I think they are a bit of a you problem. Most likely related to some issues with specific packages you have installed and upgrading from version to version.
I think it's partly an older packages you have to source new versions of elsewhere kind of issue, and that you don't have with a rolling release. Not entirely user error, but these types of distros suggested for newer users seems like just a way to push new users away the when the 1st major update and OS goes belly up. Ubuntu broke basically every major update before I moved away from it. Great for a server where you're not looking for new software/drivers and just want stability, horrible for a desktop IMHO.
This is my Tahoe as well. I love my distro because it has a huge package repository and it keeps everything very up-to-date. I read all the time the downside of both these things is “instability”. The thing is, I have not experienced that instability at all. In fact, it has been quite a bit more problem free than the less rolling, more heavily curated package distros that I used to use. Looking back, a big reason for that is that I used to install a lot of “unofficial” packages to work around either missing packages or packages that were just too old for my needs. I think these “unofficial” packages made my installation fragile and upgrades unreliable. In practice, my “unstable” and “expert only” distro has been much more stable and required researching solutions to problems less often.
Tell me more about your Tumbleweed+NVIDIA problems. I'm on Leap 15.5, but with all this I've thought about moving over to Tumbleweed or Fedora. My card is NVIDIA, so I'm not looking for a big headache.
The kernel got updated fairly frequently in Tumbleweed, and more than once I had to manually uninstall and reinstall Nvidia drivers afterwards. Even that didn't work once, and I had to roll back the kernel version to get a working X session. At that point I pinned my kernel to that outdated version so it would not get updated again and I could move on with my life.
I also never figured out how I could get both the Nvidia drivers and other kernel modules (specifically ZFS) to function together.
This is why I grudgingly switched back to Ubuntu. Though to be fair, even Ubuntu LTS, with Nvidia drivers in the official repository, has its issues. For example, they had (and I think still have, though I haven't checked in a few months) incorrect dependencies so I could not install the latest drivers along with the latest CUDA libraries. I could either manually install everything from Nvidia or stick with older drivers in the official repos. Both methods come with their share of problems.
God I hate Nvidia drivers.
Yeah. I often kick myself for getting an nvidia card. My former distro was Ubuntu so I'm familiar with it from that end. I can see how having a constantly updating kernel could cause pain with the nvidia drivers. Even on leap or Ubuntu any tine the nvidia drivers updated it took a fair bit of extra time for regular apt/zypper processing kernel stuff and whatnot.
im going to keep a sharp eye on slowroll. I might be crazy enough to (eventually) try to convert from leap 15.5 to tumbleweed to slowroll. If it all blows up I was probably going to have to do that anyway.
Exciting news.