this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
208 points (96.4% liked)

politics

19103 readers
4522 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The White House plans to send a letter to top US news executives on Wednesday, urging them to intensify their scrutiny of House Republicans after Speaker Kevin McCarthy launched an impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden, despite having found no evidence of a crime.

“It’s time for the media to ramp up its scrutiny of House Republicans for opening an impeachment inquiry based on lies,” Ian Sams, a spokesperson for the White House Counsel’s Office, wrote in the letter, according to a draft copy obtained by CNN.

The letter, which said an impeachment inquiry with no supporting evidence should “set off alarm bells for news organizations,” will be sent to executives helming the nation’s largest news organizations, including CNN, The New York Times, Fox News, the Associated Press, CBS News, and others, a White House official familiar with the matter said.

all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fuzzy_Dunlop@lemm.ee 47 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is pretty ridiculous. Every politician is full of shit to at least some degree, and our "reporters" are horribly biased and broken. If they really want to do something about it, they can discuss broadcasting standards or maybe consequences for deliberately deceptive journalism. No single group or issue should have its own standard.

[–] orrk@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

that would literally put the entire Murdoch empire out of business, you can't do that!

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 year ago

Covering impeachment as a process story – Republicans say X, but the White House says Y – is a disservice to the American public who relies on the independent press to hold those in power accountable.

Thank God someone finally had the balls to tell this to the press. If someone says it's raining and someone says it's not, it isn't the press's job to report both sides of the story. It's their job to put their fucking head out the window and find out!

[–] cerevant@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Republicans: see? Now we have evidence that the liberal biased mainstream media take their marching orders from the Democrats.

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I mean, I can't entirely say I would blame the average conservative for seeing it that way. The optics of this move on the Biden administration are terrible. The impeachment attempt is bullshit, but Biden reaching out to the media to shine more of a spotlight on it does look like an attempt at collusion between the media and the Democrats. This is absolute candy to conservative conspiracy theorists.

[–] Heresy_generator@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The Democrats have been so disadvantaged by the media over the last decade that they're now publicly begging them to actually investigate and cover the news thoroughly rather than regurgitating sensationalized Republican propaganda and that looks like collusion between the media and the Democrats to you?

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

No, as I said, to me it looks like a dumb move on Biden administration's part, because it looks like a collusion attempt to conservatives. Maybe I could have worded that a little clearer, but that's what I meant.

[–] transigence@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What world are you living in? All but one or two televised media outlets bend over backwards with big money to run cover for the left. Are you seriously suggesting that CNN, MSNBC, and ABC disadvantage the Democrats?

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Assuming this is a data-based decision I'm guessing pollsters and their swingometers have decided that the conspiracy nuts are just a lost cause and this will win more independent votes than are in the delta of lost Republican apostate votes

[–] cerevant@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Agree. This is a really bad move.

[–] phillaholic@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

It doesn’t matter. Whatever Biden does or doesn’t do, right wing media blames him. Stop catering to these people. Facts are facts. Report them.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fox News plans to respond by sending the White House a print-out of a photo of Hannity giving them the finger.

Then he'll spend a week on the "Biden crime family."

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Actually, it's a picture of Hunter, and that's not his finger....

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

9 months and no evidence...

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well it's um... in Hunter Biden's laptop!

[–] keeb420@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

i heard hunters laptop has a big hard drive

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sure the corporate conservative media, oops, I mean "liberal media", absolutely won't engage in bothsiderist "objective" horse race douchebaggery this time around... 🙄

[–] ubermeisters@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well that was fucking stupid, all you're doing is giving me opposing party ammunition

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They aren't giving them ammunition if they have nothing to hide.

[–] ubermeisters@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Pretty dumb take tbh

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The correspondence comes one day after McCarthy announced that he had directed three House committees to begin an impeachment inquiry into Biden.

House Republicans, most of whom have denied that disgraced former President Donald Trump committed any wrongdoing, have long sought to baselessly portray Biden as a corrupt, crime-ridden politician engaged in sinister activities.

While news organizations have published innumerable fact checks on the matter, they have also often failed to robustly call out the mis- and disinformation peddled by Republicans in their coverage, frustrating officials in the Biden White House who believe that the news media should be doing more to dispel lies that saturate the public discourse.

In its letter Wednesday, the White House will ask news organizations to be more clear-eyed in their coverage of the impeachment inquiry, and not to fall prey to the traps of false equivalency in reporting.

“Covering impeachment as a process story – Republicans say X, but the White House says Y – is a disservice to the American public who relies on the independent press to hold those in power accountable,” Sams wrote.

“And in the modern media environment, where every day liars and hucksters peddle disinformation and lies everywhere from Facebook to Fox, process stories that fail to unpack the illegitimacy of the claims on which House Republicans are basing all their actions only serve to generate confusion, put false premises in people’s feeds, and obscure the truth,” Sams added.


The original article contains 448 words, the summary contains 240 words. Saved 46%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!