this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
896 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

58133 readers
4744 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Not disclosing advertisements runs afoul of the FTC's rules.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hayes_@sh.itjust.works 225 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Yeah this is straight up illegal. The FTC and EU don’t give a shit if this was “just a test” or “a whoopsie doopsie.”

Big ol’ fine incoming for every day this isn’t fixed.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.social 188 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's actually fairly simple. If a user notices a post in their feed from an account they don't follow, they can simply click or tap on the three dot icon located in the upper right-hand corner of the specific post. This will open a drop-down menu.

However, if the post is an ad, this menu provides additional options. ... "Not interested in this ad," ... "Report ad" ... "Why this ad?"

You bet your ass that they are going to get rid of those options.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 66 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I noticed people have been putting community notes on ads, I wonder how long that's going to last.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

I give it until Tuesday.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i don’t want to bet my ass :(

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't worry, I already bet your ass for you.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] fubo@lemmy.world 124 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Crime crimers doing crimes.

[–] FilthyHands@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago

Oh, commit a crime? Just commit a crime? Why don't i strap on my crime helmet and squeeze down into a crime cannon and fire off into crime land, where crimes grow on crimees!

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 94 points 1 year ago

Only a true genius could have taken that failing company and transformed it it into the criminally failing company that it is today.

[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 76 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wonder if this is a bug not a feature. Since, ya know, 90%(?) of the workforce was essentially forced out

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.social 63 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

The bug is the feature. Firing 90% of the company doesn't just save you a ton of money, and doesn't just trim the fat or rot of a company. It removes any dissidents and skeptics who don't have total, unwavering, boot-licking loyalty. Even Musk fanboys were likely forced out just for questioning whether it was a good idea to fire 90% of them. The slightest hint of independent critical thinking is snuffed out by force, or leaves the company voluntarily when they see the writing on the wall, or they are merely unable to leave.

What else could that maneuver possibly produce except a small army of sycophants?

And then once you have those sycophants, it doesn't matter whether you make good or bad decisions, you will never ever be challenged on them. You don't have to worry about how your orders become reality or if you break any laws along the way, your gang ~~of losers~~ will make it happen and won't ask for a penny of overtime pay.

Hanlon's Razor is dead, at least as applied to Musk, because the malice and stupidity are one and the same.

EDIT: Consideration for H1B

[–] Natanael 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Hanlon's Margin of Error

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago

Hanlon's razor always sucked was always a literal joke. But I'm glad to see someone else realize it shouldn't be taken seriously.

[–] sonnenzeit@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You do realize that a lot of employeess that stayed at Twitter after Musk's take over did so because their work visas were tied to the occupation and otherwise they would have had to leave the country on short notice?

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

You're right, I didn't think of that, but that's another great example of how much contempt Musk has for his employees, and how he can ensure their loyalty: "do what I say, or I will have you deported."

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago

It takes work to make it go away.

[–] Ddhuud@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Is this company still worth "billions" with a b?

[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

With a b, probably. With an s, less clear.

[–] alansuspect@aussie.zone 18 points 1 year ago
[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If you ask the people remaining on it, it's with a "t".
If you ask everybody else...

[–] skoadphilmore@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Good one, lol

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] Rambi@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's worth like $16 billion now? Which compared to the $44 billion purchasing price is... does caculations not good

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought I just saw in the last day or so that it could actually be worth as little as $4B now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 41 points 1 year ago

These days whenever there is a new change on Twitter's UI, I'm not sure if it's a bug or intentional feature.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Later, Musk tweets that they were just doing to a test to collect data. Because they want to prove that having to label them is bad and destroys engagement.

Someone ping me if this happens.

[–] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would love to see him blatantly admit to illegal activity

load more comments (1 replies)

meh, if youre still using this dying platform, i kinda think its on you at this point.

[–] J12@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is exactly why I haven’t updated the app in months. I don’t see all the shitty changes, my Twitter is still Twitter and I can easily block all the advertisements.

[–] radiated@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

why not just stop using twitter?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›