this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
409 points (94.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9675 readers
96 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] spicytuna62@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm in favor of lower speed limits, but this will result in a temporary uptick in speeding tickets, followed by loss of interest by local police, which yields no net change. Lowering the speed limit is a band aid fix. It's quick. It's cheap. But it can, by no means, be seen as a permanent solution. If you want people to slow down, you need to make a road that will make people want to slow down. So yeah, I like lower speed limits, but they cannot and do not work alone. It's a step in the right direction, but more should be done.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They're not just lowering the speed limit. From the FAQ:

Will the roll out involve money being spent on speed bumps?

There is no plan to include traffic calming (including speed bumps) as part of the change to speed limits. There are other ‘softer’ measures that might be introduced, such as using buffer speed limits, removing the centre line, narrowing the carriageway visually, using planting etc.

These 'softer' measures (which definitely are traffic calming) will be essential to make this plan a success. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada is going through a similar process of lowering speed limits in residential areas. The planning staff said they needed the speed lowered so they could implement these traffic calming measures, otherwise the speed limit would be higher than the street design can accommodate.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i can understand not strictly calling paint traffic calming, but planters? what galaxy brain definition of traffic calming are they using where placing a box on the road isn't traffic calming?

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

My guess is the phrase "traffic calming" has negative connotations with the local general public due to poor implementation.

I've driven down streets that are 50km/h and I think most people would gladly do ≤60km/h. If that's too fast, there's many ways to 'softly' calm the speed like narrowing the road, chicanes, paving stones, etc. Instead, they have speed bumps ever couple kms so drivers slow to a crawl for the bump, then accelerate hard to >70km/h, then brake hard to go over the next bump.

[–] oo1@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

yeah there are places where you can add a hard separated a bike lane and rejig parking - not so much for the bikes, but to narrow the carriage way and reduce the 'natural' speed of the road.

[–] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 year ago (12 children)

While it sounds good on paper, in practice, they've screwed it up. They're putting the new speed limits in place on every 30mph road in Wales before they've put the public transport alternatives in place.

There's currently no reason for someone to switch to public transport, especially if the buses are going to be stuck at the same speed as the cars, but stopping regularly too. Our roads are too narrow to install bus lanes, and barely have enough room for single file traffic through lots of the towns and villages. The trains are being upgraded, but that's not scheduled to finish until at least next year, and at the moment they're slow and very unreliable. It feels like every week the trains are cancelled and an inadequate replacement bus service is put on.

I'm disabled, and have to travel from my town, Aberdare, to the main hospital in Cardiff, UHW, on a regular basis. If I had to leave now, it would take 42 minutes by car, or 2 hours and 6 minutes by public transport. The shortest journey is tomorrow morning and would take 1 hour and 31 minutes, more than double the time of the car journey. The closest inpatient hospital is 22 minutes by car, or over an hour by public transport. The difference the new speed limits are going to make is negligible compared to how slow public transport is here.

All this is going to do is annoy and upset people, and turn them off the idea of using public transport, and push a lot of people towards voting for the parties who were against this. Out of the main parties, that mainly seems to be the Conservatives, so that's going to be bad for all of us.

[–] theplanlessman@feddit.uk 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The FAQ in OP's link tells you that it is not all 30mph roads, but rather all restricted roads, with a link to a map of all 30mph roads that are staying 30mph as well as the option to see which restricted roads will change to 20mph. "Restricted Roads" is a classification of roads in law that is defined by the lamppost density, so this change won't affect larger and more rural roads where lampposts are more sparse.

[–] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

Then they've screwed up the marketing. Everything they've been pushing out makes it appear that it's all roads. Not that there's much of a difference. There's a grand total of two roads in my area, and five in the Aberdare area that will apparently stay as 30mph.

[–] theo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Tories originally supported the proposal which is quite hilarious seeing how much stink they are throwing currently.

I do agree public transport needs more funding but they are in a pretty tricky situation where the Gov has very little money to improve the service (partly due to Wales transport funds being spent on HS2) and at the same time bus usage is down and not recovered after lockdowns. I hope the 20mph limits will encourage more onto busses, but I am not confident.

[–] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago

The Tories are bullshitting to gain support? That's not like them 🤔🤥

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

At this point it sounds like me on my E-bike would be the fastest thing on the road. It does 25mph/40kph

[–] theplanlessman@feddit.uk 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Which would mean that you would also be speeding, since e-bikes in the UK are required by law to be capped at 15.5mph (technically 25kph).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] oo1@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

and i think the 20mph limit would also apply too - so even if the cap were lifted, you can't go breaking the speed limit just because it's a bike.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I wish my neighborhood would do this. 25mph feels really fast on my street. I usually hover around 15-20 when I'm not paying attention to my speed.

Edit: I am surprised that this was my third most controversial comment since I've joined

[–] theplanlessman@feddit.uk 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's been surprising to see just how many pro-car users seem to lurk on these anti-car/pro-alternative transport communities.

[–] MrLuemasG@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This community regularly makes it to the front page of Everything. It's really not that isolated from the rest of Lemmy

[–] theplanlessman@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess that's the difference in scale between here and Reddit. r/fuckcars was tiny compared to the whole of reddit, but I guess this is large enough to be prominent in Everything.

[–] MrLuemasG@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I dunno, I didn't subscribe to /r/fuckcars on reddit, but I got their posts all the time on /r/all back in the day. I think a lot of people just don't like having to rely on cars 😅

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

They're probably imagining me as that Prius or something slowing them down in traffic. My neighborhood is basically one lane when people are parked, and there are a lot of kids, so if they drove the road they'd understand.

[–] FleetingTit@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Fuck cars is regularly in my "everything" feed. And most of these measures aim to reduce traffic, which ultimately benefits the remaining car drivers.

[–] frankPodmore 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's cool. One of the advantages of lower speed limits is that while they slightly improve safety, they massively improve the perception of safety. When people feel safe walking and cycling, they're more likely to do it. So, lower speed limits decrease the subjective desire to drive, and thereby reduce car dependency.

[–] mrpants@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you have numbers on this?

[–] frankPodmore 3 points 1 year ago

I saw a study a long time ago, but I'm afraid I can't find it now! I think it was UK-based, possibly by TfL or the DfT.

[–] ScotinDub@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Amazing news, can imagine how much quieter Wales will become as a result of this

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean. Before this all you could hear was crazy "oooooooo" "oooooooooooo" sounds under the water. Wasn't that bad.

[–] oo1@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

naah, all those bloody gangs of orcas, bombing aroung the neighbourhood at 30+mph, right by schools too , about time someone put a stop to it.
https://a-z-animals.com/blog/how-fast-do-whales-swim/

[–] Darthjaffacake@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ah shit man I thought cthulu agreed to be chill for a bit longer

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

I thought this said whales for a second, and I was very intrigued how whales were causing the speed limit to be lowered. Maybe a whale carcass nearby at risk of exploding? Maybe a bridge that whales like to spout on?

[–] comfisofa@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This will hopefully ensure less people get hit by cars when the fights inevitably break out on the roads near pubs after Wales lose to Fiji and Australia and exit in the group stage of the Rugby World Cup this month

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Welsh parliament has passed a law bringing down the speed limit on all residential roads and busy streets to 20 mph (30 km/h).

Wales will introduce a default speed limit of 20 mph (30 km/h) in built-up areas from next year, in a bid to lower road collisions and noise pollution, as well as encourage people to walk or cycle.

The Welsh parliament voted on Tuesday to back the plan, which will bring down the speed limit currently set at 30 mph (50 km/h) on most busy streets and residential roads.

Both Labour and Plaid Cymru, who have a cooperation agreement and hold almost three-quarters of the 60 Senedd seats, backed the plan, but it has been met with criticism too.

Reasons for opposing the scheme ranged from concerns it could “annoy” drivers to an increase in journey time and congestion.

“They are quite rightly very concerned as they believe that pollution is increasing because cars have to drive in a lower gear and wait longer at traffic lights, there have also been more accidents,” he said.


The original article contains 609 words, the summary contains 178 words. Saved 71%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It could “annoy drivers”? Believe me, so many things do.
Also, it’s very likely that due to lower speeds, less congestion will happen and so, travel time will actually be shorter.

[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

When I drive nothing annoys me more than other drivers.

load more comments
view more: next ›