this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
99 points (78.6% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3309 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

GOP presidential hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy did not back down Sunday when questioned about comments he made during a campaign stop in Iowa Friday, calling Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) part of the “modern KKK.”

“I stand by what I said to provoke an open and honest discussion in this country,” Ramaswamy said during an interview on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This little shit is so smarmy.

[–] meldroc@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I can't stop calling him Ramasmarmy! Every time I see that asshole grin on his face.

[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I was going with Ramaslimy, but I might like smarmy better.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I like it! I'll probably end up doing the same now lol.

[–] MicroWave@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

During his Friday appearance in Iowa, Ramaswamy accused Pressley, the first Black woman elected to represent Massachusetts in Congress, of racism and compared her to “modern grand wizards” of the Ku Klux Klan for comments she made in 2019, saying: “We don’t need any more Black faces that don’t want to be a Black voice.” Pressley clarified her remarks at the time, noting on social media that she “speaking to the collective impact of lifting up one’s lived experience, whatever that is.”

Pressley, a progressive elected to the House in 2018, shot back on Saturday, calling the comments “harmful.”

“We typically don’t engage in these bad-faith attacks but yesterday a line was crossed. A GOP candidate referred to Ayanna as ‘a modern grand wizard of the KKK’ because she speaks out against racial injustice,” Pressley’s team said in a fundraising pitch. “This is backwards and harmful, but that is the point.”

[–] Kalcifer@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago

You conveniently left out what immediately followed that quote in the article:

But on Sunday, Ramaswamy did not back down when he was repeatedly questioned about the comparison by Bash.

“I think it is the same spirit to say that I can look at you and based on just your skin color, that I know something about the content of your character, that I know something about the content of the viewpoints you’re allowed to express,” Ramaswamy said, calling the rhetoric “divisive.”

[–] Spacebar@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Every attack is a confession

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

What Pressley said has nothing to do with the KKK.

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

This guy is fast proving he’s just a male MTG: shock jock politician trying bait reasonable people into engaging him and legitimizing him.

And of course, the news outlets will spread every provocative thing he says far and wide for clicks.

Fuck everything.

[–] spriteblood@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

He's just calling Pressley a poser because the OG KKK votes Republican.

[–] TheLordHumungus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Useless babies whining about each other. What is this the GOP? Embarrassing.

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

It is so weird watching national politics being conducted in terms more fitting to a playground argument. And not just in the US, we're getting a lot of it in the UK too. And I'm assuming it is similar everywhere the fash and their fellow travellers have gained some kind of platform in national politics.

There were never "grown ups" in charge. But I miss them at least pretending to be serious. Or maybe it's better that they're so laughably bad, instead of cloaking equally dire arguments in more convincing rhetoric?

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why does anyone care what this clown has to say? He’s irrelevant. Just ignore his bullshit and don’t let him get to you.