this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
346 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19454 readers
3447 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump called TikTok "worthless" and suggested he might not intervene to lift its nationwide ban, which took effect on January 19 over national security concerns about its Chinese ownership.

Previously, Trump had pledged to save TikTok, citing its role in his campaign's social media success, but his latest remarks hinted at demands for U.S. ownership of the platform.

House Speaker Mike Johnson supported the ban, citing fears of Chinese influence on TikTok's algorithms.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 2 hours ago

The stick part of the carrot and stick.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 30 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

They must not have reached the expected bribe level.

[–] Grappling7155@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 hours ago

Or meta paid even more to make it go away

[–] JPSound@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago

The deal was switched to a subscription based model.

[–] FuryMaker@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago

Bidding war. Zuckerberg paid more.

Your move China.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 50 points 1 day ago

Check bounced? Nah he got the check and it cleared and the world's tiniest gear spun in his head and he thought "what if 2 checks?!?!!?".

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 181 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Man, I really hope he does the double-flipflop on this and bans it again. Because Tiktok pulled the stunt this weekend to kiss his ass, blocking the app preemptively for the USA and crediting Trump with "saving" it with the popup message. This would be most disruptive to the propaganda pushers on both sides of the globe, and piss off the most people against them.

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 85 points 1 day ago (3 children)

u-turning so fast he's basically drifting in circles.

[–] FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FediNeko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

it amuses me that people expect anything else from his presidency. it will be a "highest bidder wins" war.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Imagine having your entire business plans hanging on the whims of this orange dickhead.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

I suspect it's a share price influencing game with some of his pals.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 125 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"Donald Trump says dumb fucking thing after other dumb fucking contradictory thing"

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Onion should just print this headline every day for the next 4 years.

[–] Vladkar@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Nah, that's too realistic for The Onion. It needs to be something like, 'Pandemonium Ensues After Trump Utters First Coherent Sentence.'

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 day ago

And this strategy works for him just fine. People who like him will believe the thing they want to hear and some of the people who would have opposed him will be confused and delay action because they think maybe it's just going to work out and they should focus elsewhere.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is leverage, nothing more. He has every intention of saving it. He's just going to make sure that he gets his cut and assurances that any anti-Trump videos be scrubbed and any searches return no results. And he wants to make sure they continue to do what he wants, when he wants, and the way he wants by literally hanging a potential ban over their heads that he can sign into effect by EO at the stroke of his favorite sharpie.

It is literally a Mafia protection racket on steroids.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I disagree. Trump and Musk own competitors to TokTok.

They are not going to hurt themselves in order to help a Chinese competitor.

Also, they are now in the ones in charge AND the Chinese government is actually using TikTok to spy on THEM.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Meta dropped a bigger check maybe.

[–] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago

Elno reminded him he owns both X and Trump.

[–] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 9 points 1 day ago

Probably did. Could easily be a grifter move to dupe them into writing another check. Suckers.

[–] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Guess they didn't donate enough to his inauguration fund.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 45 points 1 day ago (4 children)

How does this lower the cost of my eggs?

[–] marius@feddit.org 17 points 1 day ago

You missunderstood. This ends the war in Ukraine

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (4 children)

That was a strange video to listen to. He wants the US to own half... Like nationalizing the platform?

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 70 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He wants his cut, like the mafia

[–] TorJansson@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago

To "wet his beak"

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think he understands the difference between a government and a corporation. Like, he imagines the US is just his now. Just a big hotel, he can buy and sell bits of it to make money. Buy Greenland and Tiktok, sell Puerto Rico and the USS George Bush. Add a cover charge for Canada and Mexico.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 day ago

To be fair, at this point there is barely any difference.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Obviously not like that, but wants it privately owned by his "American" cronies... like Elon

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 26 points 1 day ago

He logged in and instead of seeing people praising him, he saw people continue to mock him and call him a dumb, fascist, piece of shit.

[–] zib@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

I'm getting whiplash from all the backtracking and it's only day two.

[–] GluWu@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago
[–] DegenerationIP@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

A platform that probably helped him a lot becoming the president. How ironic.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I was sticking with rednote anyway.

spoiler

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago

I was sticking to not joining social media owned by people who want to make profit with my info...

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even if this were psy-ops... this is how you write psy-ops, goddamn

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

Are we the psy-op going to chinese social media and humanizing Americans or are they the psy-op by acting human when the Americans show up?

If it's the first, where's my check? If it's the second, congrats to my chinese spy on landing the easiest job in the world.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Did tiktok not offer to kiss his ass or pay him tribute like all the other companies?

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

i think zuckerberg kissed his ass harder and more affectionately than tiktok did

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flying_gel@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

I think it's a threat to ensure that TikTok does what he says. Lots of reports (that I as an Australian can't verify before it works for me) of searches for Trump incriminating videos are returning no results since it came back. It feels like there were conditions on not banning TikTok.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

He's talking big so that Tiktok sells their US operations to Elon. Then he gets to take credit as a deal maker.

[–] bdot@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

let me guess? Zuckerberg phoned him up and reminded him of all that lovely lobby money that had been shared around!

[–] radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What pisses me off the most is that he blatantly places no consideration about the security implications of this decision. It is just about making a deal for his tech bros.

[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He doesn’t give a flying fuck about the country. He’d burn it all down if it could turn a profit for him.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›