this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
28 points (91.2% liked)

Ask Science

8635 readers
5 users here now

Ask a science question, get a science answer.


Community Rules


Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.


Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.


Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.


Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.


Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.


Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.


Rule 7: Report violations.Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.


Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.


Rule 9: Source required for answers.Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.


By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.

We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Let's say the quantum uncertainty which is currently quite small and doesn't affect our life on macroscopic scale suddenly increased. Magically we are still living in this weird rule of physics. How would we see daily stuff? like how would I see a ball rolling in my sight?

all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bool@lemm.ee 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Real life quantum physicist here. When you say you want the uncertainty principle to be bigger, what you are really saying is you want Planck’s constant to be a bigger number. This has much bigger consequences than you might expect, because if nothing else about the universe changes (for example Coulomb’s constant) then the energy levels of atomic transitions all get out of whack, you break chemistry and chemical bonding, and there is no such thing as a basketball because there are no such thing as rubber molecules.

[–] shapis@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

A good way of exposing this idea to people is showing them the step by step of how to get the particle in the box energy equation and then generalizing it for 3d.

It becomes really obvious the issues that happen when you have degenerate states.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

So basically, we would just skip straight to the heat death of the universe, right?

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

Magically we are still living in this weird rule of physics.

That's the problem, you wouldn't be living.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 8 points 1 year ago

With even a small increase in uncertainty in electron position, electricity would start to behave differently. Everything electronic, which depends on electron flow through very tiny conductors, would become unreliable as the electron flow would be unpredictable. Even basic light bulbs probably wouldn't work.

Chemistry is the exchange of electrons between atoms. All molecular bonds happen through the exchange of electrons from one atom to another... so an increase in uncertainty would result in the bonds breaking down. Molecules would break apart, every material you think of as solid would disintegrate into its base atoms.

So, your rolling ball would cease to be a cohesive ball, and the surface it is rolling on would also cease to be.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

We already have that. They're called toddlers.