this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
59 points (96.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

9998 readers
24 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Well, I guess that's one way to solve the problem 🙄

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Exactly. That is the only solution!

In no way would it be better to rule that cars need to become regular-sized again. Imagine, not having two steps at your door to enter the vehicle, or not sitting as high as long-haul truck drivers!

If the car does not need a minimum of 1.8 parking spaces, it is too small!

[–] Damionsipher@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This policy is at the state level and states do not have jurisdiction over vehicle standards. Vehicle standards are regulated by the national government, so this is more of an addressing the symptom of an issue the state has no control over the cause of. That doesn't mean it's not ridiculous that garage size regulations are what's changing, but let's cast share where it's due.

[–] br3d@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't know the Australian constitution, but I'm guessing there's nothing in there that obliges states to accommodate stupid decisions by national government?

[–] Damionsipher@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I don't know the Australian constitution or legal structure either, but as vehicle regulations are set by the feds thes states still need to deal with the repercussions. They could do nothing instead, but they have no power to reduce vehicle sizes. A better approach might be to get rid of parking requirements altogether. But, that's more likely to be political suicide for the elected officials than to spur on a broader anti-car sentiment, especially given the rural nature of the state.

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I like the hallway to one room

[–] CTDummy@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Not even big on the fuckcars movement and still I think just ban the fucking things. Most of em aren’t even owned by people who use utes for work. Practically every tradie I know has snap ons. These things are owned by fuckwits with too much money wanting to LARP as blue collar workers.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 days ago

This reminds me of an old joke where there's a pothole in the street causing major accidents, and the solution is to move the pothole in front of the hospital so that people can get medical care more quickly.

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago

Absolutely amazing that vehicle safety standards can be regulated, but not vehicle sizes.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I can appreciate forcing large car owners to stop externalizing their problems. There's more to do, but this is a good move. Not the final move, not the best move, just a good move.