Uh... What? The US has twice the aircraft carriers as every other country combined
this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2024
61 points (89.6% liked)
News
23749 readers
4188 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yes but China has been rolling out some impressive new ships that the US doesn’t have for awhile now on top of their recent aviation announcements so people are getting a little concerned
China doesn't have shit to challenge the U.S.
They don't have the experience, the doctrine, or the technology.
Anyone who considers China a legitimate naval threat is vastly overstating China's capabilities.
The only thing they are capable of is bullying tiny countries.
exactly so let's say I'm way stronger than you but you start working out hard, so will I hopefully you never catch up
Any excuse for shinier boats
Yes, that. The US DoD has been playing this trick since the end of WW2, and it keeps working.
It keeps working because every politician in this slavemaster system supports it completely.
Who touched the boats?
Oooofff, I'll get the popcorn.
Let's see what our proportional retaliation will be.
Paywalled but from what little I can see, the only response is: DUH!
I imagine if I were able to read it, it’s just hand wringing and fan service to the military industrial complex, no real substance. Aside from the military, shipbuilding left this country decades ago and no one seems to want to do anything about it. We can’t even manage taking care of our own infrastructure, build an EV supply chain when there was no competition yet, or restore the microprocessor supply chain we still have some of. I don’t see how anything happens here, especially if we’re focusing on cutting government services for the next four years
We can't afford to do things like infrastructure because we spend all our money on massive overkill naval (etc.) superiority. If these "fears" are founded at all, it could only be due to us making the blunder of "fighting the last war" and wasting trillions of dollars on the wrong tech (e.g. going all-in on aircraft carriers that are alarmingly vulnerable to modern missile attacks), not failing to budget [way more than] enough money to begin with.
Here you go, full article:
Thank you kindly! I browse Lemmy on my phone and never figured out how to do that on the tiny screen
Car dependency is a fundamentally unsustainable con. We will never be able to maintain that garbage infrastructure. Yet the preservation of this moronic privilege is a primary goal of the MIC. It's a self-eating snake that poops gold for warmongers.
The MIC "fears" slowing down its planet-destroying profits.