this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
59 points (95.4% liked)

Murdered by Words

1533 readers
1 users here now

Responses that completely destroy the original argument in a way that leaves little to no room for reply - a targeted, well-placed response to another person, organization, or group of people.

The following things are not grounds for murder:

Rules:

  1. Be civil and remember the human. No name calling or insults. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone else.
  2. Discussion is encouraged but arguments are not. Don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.
  3. No bigotry of any kind.
  4. Censor the person info of anyone not in the public eye.
  5. If you break the rules you’ll get one warning before you’re banned.
  6. Enjoy the community in the light hearted way it’s intended.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bkmps3@aussie.zone 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Imagine driving around, probably with a punisher logo somewhere on your uniform or gear, and then posting your big bust of… store brand groceries

[–] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

No one else has pointed it out yet but this cop also somehow got himself a $90k Hellcat for his patrol car.

[–] PenIsland@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you see someone stealing food... No you didn't

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Stealing food doesn't mean you're immoral, it means society is immoral.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

If they're stealing it to eat, sure.

If they're stealing it so they can sell warm coat meat down the local flat roof pub and spend the proceeds on heroin, then... you probably also want to pretend you didn't see it because you're not paid enough to be stabbed by a junkie with a used syringe.

Having to steal food is super tiresome. Would rather not have to, but I've never felt bad about doing it. Imagine that. The normalization of the degradation is my issue personally. Putting people on one side of a moral line based on bullshit economic factors that for the one stealing are a kin to the winds of fate.

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I care less WHY they stole the food. I just find it distasteful when the cops post these "look how bad ass we are" social media posts. Crime, no matter why it was committed, should not be used as someones time to celebrate or the special time before the trial to convince the public that the suspect is guilty via Facebook,etc. Least of all by the group of people who do the arresting.

[–] killa44@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It's because the police view themselves as a "team" that is basically 'playing' against the other team....everyone else. To them, this is a win and shows how good they are. It's quite disturbing how indoctrinated they are and almost nobody realizes it.

They weren't even stealing name brand groceries! Lots of those are store brand products.

[–] owatnext@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They deleted the Tweet and released a halfhearted apology.

[–] oryx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

As is tradition

[–] nutbiggums@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Now he just sits back and waits on his promotion. Nailed the asshole part of the evaluation

[–] nomecks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Inspector Javert over here.

[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Just because somebody is stealing food doesn't mean they have to steal to live. Some people are just assholes.

[–] steakmeout@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean you're being one right now.

[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Don't👏commit👏crimes👏

[–] steakmeout@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Don't👏be👏ball👏cancer👏

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

If only you could stack "wage theft" on the back of a dodge for a social media photo op and brag about how the criminal behind it is being refused bail.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just because somebody stole food because they're an asshole doesn't mean that everybody who steals food is an asshole.

We don't actually know which is true here, but we do know that it's far more likely someone is stealing groceries because the wealth inequality horrorshow has grown even more perverse in the last year.

Nevertheless, rather than defending an unnamed person from potentially reprehensible police, you defended the police and an unnamed retail store from a potentially reprehensible person.

I hope you've got shares in a grocery chain because it would be deeply pitiful if you weren't even doing this out of self-interest.

[–] fidodo@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Call me crazy but I like to give people the benefit of the doubt before assuming the worst when I don't know their situation.

[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bro, this is the internet. None of it matters.

[–] kool_newt@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Your mom should really be limiting your screen time.

[–] EstT@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ok, so here is my apparently unpopular opinion: Stealing is bad, and trying to justify it is not ok and dangerous.

[–] kool_newt@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

A hungry person stealing needed food is never immoral. A hungry person stealing from companies involved in making their life desperate enough to need to steal is highly moral.

Defending the wealthy against hungry people is immoral.

[–] lescher@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They also stole condoms, the ones they harm the most is their direct neighborhood when cheap stores leave the area and the remaing stores shift the burden of lost merchandise onto the paying customers.

[–] ScrivenerX@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Condoms, which should be free.

No person lost their job or saw a difference in price due to this amount of theft. Stop spouting corporate propaganda.

[–] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

I think the person you responded to pointed out the condoms because they believe food-insecure people shouldn't have sex. Which is silly--you don't always have a choice in sex (not everyone's relationships are healthy). And if you're going to have sex, preventing unwanted pregnancy and disease is the responsible choice.