this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
283 points (99.6% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5279 readers
954 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BongRipsMcGee420@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

We subsidize all the wrong things. A McDouble is out of reach for most as a casual snack without subsidies, and arguably it should be out of reach so plant based alternatives have a chance at competing. Same with oil. Should gradually roll back the subsidies so people can have time to switch, but they should still be rolled back.

[–] UsernameLost@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

McDouble

casual snack

I don't necessarily disagree with you, but casual snack?

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's a small burger my guy

Then again I'm 6'4" so maybe my perspective is skewed

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

You're just looking at it from a different angle, that's all

[–] UsernameLost@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm 6'2", wouldn't refer to it as a casual snack. When I hear casual snack, I'm thinking like an orange or a protein bar or something, not a whole-ass burger. Yeah, it's not massive, but not a small snack either

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

An orange weighs about 150 grams on average

A mcdouble is about 165

So yeah, casual snack

[–] beetus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Weird comparison.

A mcdouble is about 400 calories. Whereas a 150g orange is about 75.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago

Not at all, they're about the same size and mass

We don't eat based exclusively off caloric value and you know it

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think he means in terms of a dollar menu item which sorta disapeared with the latest inflation.

[–] UsernameLost@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I get that, just commenting on referring to a McDouble as a casual snack

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

yeah was more the frugal entree choice

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

Yup. These companies take trillions of dollars in corporate welfare, and then use some of that money to lobby against social welfare. They use our own money to bribe the government not to do things with our money that benefit us.

[–] jungekatz@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

While students need to take loans ?

I can't even comprehend the magnitude of this rate

[–] pizzaiolo 4 points 1 year ago

The worst part is we all pay for it