this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
649 points (99.2% liked)

World News

32075 readers
931 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SecretSauces@lemmy.world 99 points 1 year ago (8 children)

India achieving what Russia couldn't. Great job India!

[–] VanillaGorilla@kbin.social 63 points 1 year ago

What do you mean couldn't? They landed as well. Just faster and less controlled...

Good job India!

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 67 points 1 year ago (32 children)

Awesome news! Go India! 🇮🇳

load more comments (32 replies)
[–] severien@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (17 children)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 31 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Three other nations — the US, China, and the former Soviet Union — have all previously achieved a soft landing near the Moon’s equator, a safer region with (comparatively) amiable temperatures and terrain and reliable sunlight to recharge solar-powered instruments.

By contrast, much of the Moon’s southern pole is littered with deep craters and basins that are permanently shrouded in darkness.

The extreme conditions in these “cold traps” make remote observation from Earth difficult and present problems for operating sensitive equipment in the region.

The Chandrayaan-3 spacecraft took 22 days to enter the Moon’s orbit on August 5th, following its launch from the Satish Dhawan Space Centre on July 14th.

On August 17th, the Vikram lander carrying Pragyan — a lunar ground rover — successfully separated from its propulsion module in preparation for today’s soft landing.

The mission marks India’s second attempt at a lunar landing after the Chandrayaan-2 lander crashed into the Moon’s surface back in 2019.


The original article contains 307 words, the summary contains 158 words. Saved 49%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] SpeziSuchtel@feddit.de 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

All of the kids are holding up pictures of an american space shuttle that isn’t even designed to land on the moon. But its good that those kids have something to look up to.

[–] Parsnip8904@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The space shuttle is very photogenic 🤷

[–] SpeziSuchtel@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

True, it was the sexiest spacecraft humanity has done so far. Now we only have flying space dicks, sometimes with some smaller space dicks attached to its sides. Quite poetic.

[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 5 points 1 year ago

If you look closer, you can see that the space shuttle is actually riding on a giant flying space dick, with two smaller flying space dicks attached on the sides.

[–] Chriskmee@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, feels like we have taken a step back almost, we went from Apollo to shuttle and back to basically Apollo as far as overall look.

The closest thing to the shuttle that has a planned Q1 2024 launch date is Dreamchaser. It's much smaller than the shuttle and not nearly as capable, but it at least looks cooler and lands like the shuttle.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jay2@beehaw.org 18 points 1 year ago

Congratulations on all your hard work India. Ride the wave. It's a great accomplishment.

[–] HappyMeatbag@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Welcome to the club, India!

My only note is that you might want to get a bit more creative when choosing a name (Chandrayaan means “moon craft” or “moon vehicle” in Sanskrit).

[–] cosmic_skillet@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago

So sounds like... a good name?

[–] jernej@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

I mean USA names it after moon god, Russia just calls it moon so its as creative as the rest

It's really no less inventive than Apollo.

[–] YaaAsantewaa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago

Congrats to India

[–] HowMany@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

So what has that slacker been doing since then? Has it quantified the amount of water (as ice) located in the fissures at the south pole?

Get busy little robot - we have no time for dallying.

[–] yoppa@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Wow ! Killing it

load more comments
view more: next ›