this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
47 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1480 readers
180 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

what if my AI is basically a copy and paste tool? it just copies your work and stores it until someone wants it and then it gives it to them. it's extremely smart it can produce realistic works that it knows about perfectly

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 16 points 21 hours ago

If you go that route, then all LLM created content should be inherently FOSS licensed too and all piracy & copyright laws are off the table.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait, as AI learns the same way as humans, and humans are thus basically AI does that mean I can just pirate everything? This will change... nothing really.

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You’re a nobody with no money. No rights for you.

Try being a corporation first.

[–] zarathustra0@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

But I am simulating an AI inside my brain and I must train it.

[–] antifuchs@awful.systems 3 points 14 hours ago

Good: Now torture it

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The reason we know it's a good idea to give corporations more rights than humans is simple: corporations have no morals.

[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 4 points 4 hours ago

Piracy is allowed as long as no one enjoys it.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago

As I've seen it described: "AI provides capital with access to skills, while those who developed those skills are kept away from capital"