this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
15 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3138 readers
347 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FozzyOsbourne@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I read a good quote from nearer the election that "the British people tend to vote parties out rather than voting them in". I'd hope Labour are clever enough to realise that people wanted rid of the Tories and they happened to get in because of that!

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 8 points 1 week ago

Especially considering Starmer only won with 30% of the vote because Farage split the conservative vote.

I'd be surprised if they didn't sort that somehow by the next election.

[–] frankPodmore 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Very much so! That's why their slogan at the GE was literally just the word 'CHANGE'.

Of course, now they have to deliver change, but only change people are happy with. In fact, only change that people who might vote for them and live in winnable seats are happy with. This is the complicated bit.

[–] FozzyOsbourne@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This politics lark is a bit of a head-scratcher, eh?

[–] frankPodmore 5 points 1 week ago

Genuinely, the reason I've never gone into politics is that I absolutely do not want to have the job of solving political problems. Like, when the problem is 'not enough houses', I just want to go 'So build some houses', not the thing you actually have to do which is 'Balance the interests of a whole host of people, many of whom will be furiously ungrateful even when you do things in their interest'.

[–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 week ago

Welcome to FPTP!

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

gee who could have predicted that when they chased away the base in order to court tory voters who only voted for them because the tories messed everything up so badly

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 1 points 1 week ago

If only something could be learned from this! Oh well, time for Canada's Liberal Party to ignore progressive voters and try to court Conservative Party voters instead of working to form a coalition with the slightly leftist New Democratic Party! Surely this time it'll work!

[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If PR becomes a thing I will vote Green in general elections. Until then I will vote for whoever keeps right wing candidates out in my constituency.

[–] frankPodmore 6 points 1 week ago

Don't think there's much chance of PR passing, unfortunately. I'd vote Labour under pretty much any system, but I'd be much happier with PR than FPTP.

[–] Wimopy@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago

Labour is just dancing between centre-left and centre-right. About as status quo and mild as you can get. Why would anyone be excited for that these days?

Especially when if you ask Starmer about anything more drastic he just says "Maybe in the future, but not now/under my leadership".