this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
5 points (100.0% liked)

Skeptic

1334 readers
2 users here now

A community for Scientific Skepticism:

Scientific skepticism or rational skepticism, sometimes referred to as skeptical inquiry, is a position in which one questions the veracity of claims lacking empirical evidence.

Do not confuse this with General Skepticism, Philosophical Skepticism, or Denialism.

Things we like:

Things we don't like:

Other communities of interest:

"A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence." -David Hume

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So when it comes to Pycnogenol, I wouldn’t recommend it as a daily or routine supplement, but I wouldn’t dismiss it if someone wanted to use it for one of the more evidence-backed reasons for use. Hopefully more trials will be conducted to better establish its place in therapy.

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

The trials themselves are generally small and prone to bias. Having said that, there are some positive findings that look interesting. Pycnogenol is felt to be possibly effective for asthma (it may reduce rescue inhaler use) when added to regular asthma medications. It may also improve leg pain and reduce feelings of heaviness in patients with chronic venous insufficiency. When taken for oseteoarthritis, Pycnogenol use reduced the need for anti-inflammatory medications, compared to a placebo.

As usual with this supplement stuff- it might help make things a little better but it probably isn't worth your time and money. And if it is, a doctor will probably be the one to tell you it is.