this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
384 points (96.8% liked)

World News

32075 readers
1085 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://archive.li/10BV3

The unmanned craft was due to make a soft landing on the Moon's south pole, but failed after encountering problems as it moved into its pre-landing orbit.

It was Russia's first Moon mission in almost 50 years.

Russia has been racing to the Moon's south pole against India, whose Chandrayaan-3 spacecraft is scheduled to land on there next week.

No country has ever landed on the south pole before, although both the US and China have landed softly on the Moon's surface.

No report on whether or not Russia was attempting to use repurposed anti-ship missiles like the ones they use to attack schools and hospitals here on Earth.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 68 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't know they have schools on the moon. Or was it a power station?

[–] SpicyPeaSoup@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago

Maternity ward.

[–] clb92@feddit.dk 43 points 1 year ago

Special lunar operation.

[–] taylus@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 year ago

“This is all the West’s fault!”

[–] Che_Donkey@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Obviously it was not a moon rocket, but a Drone aimed for Kiev.

[–] Echinoderm@aussie.zone 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The moon needed to be de-nazified.

[–] Haus@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The moon was standing there, MENACINGLY!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

The Moon looked too much like a kindergarten. The lander got confused.

[–] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What's the problem. It was a lunar lander. It landed on the moon. Mission accomplished.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Nobody walked away from that landing, so it definitely wasn't a good one. The fact that there was nobody to walk away from the landing is a mere technicality.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (8 children)

The US should put a lander together out of trash for shits and giggles and have it land perfectly.

[–] EmbeddedEntropy@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

A 1979 TV show about a guy who put together a junk spaceship to salvage junk from the moon: Salvage 1.

My teenage self found it entertaining at the time. Hmmm, now where did I leave my parrot? I wonder if he could help me find a copy…

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Or just land people in a few years. They're working on a several hundred ton lander right now!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I always suspected that it was just a missile painted like a rocket.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It launched on a soyuz, which has an extremely long history. It first launched in 67. All rockets back then had icbm roots or aspirations. But for a long time all icbms use solid propellent for better long term storage rather than liquid propellant like soyuz.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It seems that a dish washer's controller isn't suitable for moon landing after all.

[–] Pneuma@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

They should've upgraded it to the Logitech G F710

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TheMadnessKing@lemdro.id 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As someone fond of science, its kinda heart breaking as many people spends decades of work to make this stuff and their dreams get crushed when these fail. Hope they fix and launch another one.

[–] AlexTheTurtle@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Failures are a part of science! I hope russian scientist dont lose their funding and can continue to contribute to space exploration.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] reflex@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] jawsua@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago

Good news:

moon's no longer haunted

[–] Aurix@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The russian wording on the mission failure is something to behold. Luna-25 "ceased its existence".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 7 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Russia's Luna-25 spacecraft has crashed into the Moon after spinning out of control, officials say.

The unmanned craft was due to make a soft landing on the Moon's south pole, but failed after encountering problems as it moved into its pre-landing orbit.

The spacecraft was scheduled to land on Monday to explore a part of the Moon which scientists think could hold frozen water and precious elements.

Roscosmos, Russia's state space corporation, said on Sunday morning that it had lost contact with the Luna-25 shortly after 14:57pm (11:57 GMT) on Saturday.

"The apparatus moved into an unpredictable orbit and ceased to exist as a result of a collision with the surface of the Moon," it said in a statement.

Russia has been racing to the Moon's south pole against India, whose Chandrayaan-3 spacecraft is scheduled to land on there next week.


The original article contains 174 words, the summary contains 141 words. Saved 19%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Testing a new lithobraking maneuver.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Special crashing operation.

[–] NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Comments exactly what I expected. Disappointed how many people here are knee jerk celebrating the failure. Feels like being in a room full of Republicans when someone says anything about Mexico or Islam.

I hope they fix their shit for Luna 26 for the sake of science and human discovery.

[–] Zippy@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You know normally I would applaud them. Happy when China has a success. Screw Russia though. This was a propaganda mission to get a win. The fact that did it in a rush to beat another country is typical of their philosophy. There was little science in this but mostly just dick waving.

[–] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

This was my impression. This was a rushed propaganda mission for prestige using existing material.

Still, I'm sure there would have been some useful science done, but the main point of the mission was that Putin's regime would have been able to crow about how great Russia is doing.

Of course, if it had succeeded, it might have spurred some competitive spirit in other space powers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gerula@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Well your intention is admirable but childish.

Nobody gives a fuck about Russia's scientific endeavours when they're re starting the biggest military conflict in Europe since WWII and threatening everyone with a nuclear conflict.

Most probably any scientific progress that could be made will not be used for mankind's progress but for the current militaristic propaganda.

[–] NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All of Apollo took place during the Vietnam war. Somehow I think you'd feel differently about that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Notnotmike@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

No mention on a cause in this article, curious what it was

[–] Zoboomafoo@yiffit.net 16 points 1 year ago

There was a moon in the way

[–] Banik2008@infosec.pub 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Cutting corners due to the money being spirited away by corrupt officials. This is Russia after all.

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, it was obviously sabotage by Western Ukrainian gay Nazis.

[–] Skua@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

NATO's secret moon base lasers shot it down

[–] Madison_rogue@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Stop…everyone knows it’s moon Nazis. Haven’t you seen Iron Sky?

[–] kattenluik@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's part of the cause, not the reason why it actually failed. The people at Roscosmos do work pretty hard even though underpaid and understaffed.

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hard to make a rocket when you are afraid of windows above ground floor.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Noughmad@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

The burn to slow it down into a low orbit went too long, which made the resulting orbit too low (so low that it intersected the surface).

No word yet on why the burn was too long.

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Cause of failure: built in Russia

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] towerful@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, lithobreking.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It didn't fail! It was an attack, and it was a great success!

load more comments
view more: next ›