this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
23 points (96.0% liked)

Linux

48307 readers
1108 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For example Red Hat Enterprise Linux or SUSE Enterprise Linux.

I'm considering switching to RHEL, to get a "professional" Linux, since it's free if you register an account, but is it worth it?
Is the experience very different from Fedora?

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Peasley@lemmy.world 1 points 28 minutes ago

RHEL comes with very limited repos, so this might help: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/

[–] VanGoghsVan@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 hours ago

I manage a number of RHEL/Rocky and Ubuntu machines for work. EL is fine as a server distro but it doesn't make a great desktop distro. The packages are old and I've found it to be missing a number of packages I use on a desktop system. For a desktop, Fedora or Ubuntu is a better fit.

[–] Notamoosen@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

I think it depends on your use case. For my gaming desktop I use Fedora to get the latest packages. For professional scenarios I've been using Almalinux the past couple of years. It started life as a RHEL clone, but since RHEL changed their code distribution rules I see them more parallel in the stream rather than down. It's completely free, but there are options to purchase support and live kernel patching if required.

If you want to go the Suse route, Opensuse Leap will give you the closest experience to Suse enterprise. I believe Suse actually offers conversion tools to convert Leap to the full enterprise OS. I don't have personal experience with it, but have considered it in the past and this is the information I recall.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 hours ago

i suspect that the biggest reason to use an enterprise distribution is the support since it helps shield you from the consequences of interoperability that naturally come out of the whole linux ecosystem of the right hand not knowing what the left had is doing.

[–] Edo78@feddit.it 4 points 5 hours ago

More than a decade ago I bought SUSE enterprise for a couple of years just to support the project. Never needed any assistance so I'm not sure about a different experience. BTW The box was nice 🤣

[–] nous@programming.dev 28 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Older software is the most noticeable thing. Enterprise does not mean it is better - just that it is supported for a long time and they do that by not changing much on them. They are more designed for servers rather than workstations and generally not a great experiences unless you are running hundreds or thousands of them in an enterprise situation.

Professional just means payed for. What you are paying for is support in managing the systems, not a great user experience.

For home desktops it is far nicer to be on newer software rather than things that came out 5 to 10 years ago.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Can I assume you're not actually running an enterprise distro?

I mean, me neither, yet, but:

  • Both SUSE and Red Hat have had a minor release this year, with their software being less out of date than Debian
  • I feel like enterprise distros seem to be very different in the areas where differences between distros actually matter: Package management (which can be fine-tuned a lot more with application streams, security updates, package modules, etc.) and complete, up-to-date documentation (which is the thing most people miss in Linux).

I was really looking for real world experience, not a re-hashing of unvalidated opinions that have been around for >10 years (when they might have actually been true).

[–] chloroken@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It looks like you have your mind made up and are looking for affirmation, not discussion. Next time, say that instead of being an ass to people trying to help you.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I think I was pretty clear with what I was asking in this thread:

"Is anyone here using an enterprise Linux distro?"

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago

You also asked

I'm considering switching to RHEL, to get a "professional" Linux, since it's free if you register an account, but is it worth it?
Is the experience very different from Fedora?

[–] rjek@feddit.uk 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago

Debian from top to bottom.

[–] tutus@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 hours ago

If you're looking for something like this, but not paid for, try Debian stable. Same idea but free. Ubuntu also have an LTS version and I'm sure others.

The "Enterprise" in the title just means "support", which is a check box for a lot of organisations. Not so much home users.

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Try it out maybe? You're not buying a car... There's not much point going around and asking if you spend 20 mins trying it out and realise you don't want to use a 5 year old DE.

Basically expect the system will change only when you update to a new version, and that you'll need to use external PMs like flatpak or nix for all user packages if you plan on doing anything more advanced than browsing and office work.

[–] chloroken@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 hours ago

Read their reply. This is someone who already made their mind up without even testing it.