this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
141 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19118 readers
3264 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 21 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

So in an effort to "cut government spending", "reduce waste", and "make the government more efficient, the first thing they did was to create three new positions out of thin air with absolutely no clear goals, and grossly overpay 3 people and counting to fill those positions.......

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

Nevermind the GAO is already a thing. But three trolls think they know how government should work...

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 137 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I'm getting the feeling that DOGE is just becoming a dumping ground for anyone Trump promised favors for.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago

Fake departments don't need confirmations. Maybe he'll stick Gaetz in there too.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 66 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In this case I think it was also to get her to shut up about Matt Gaetz.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

If only they could just get her to shut up, full stop.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (3 children)

100%

That's the only reason Republicans shit talk other Republicans.

They're mad one got a special spot and they didn't.

It's going to be our saving grace, people act like they don't remember how many votes it took to get a House leader.

They'll stop each other from doing horrible shit, because they all want the credit and acclaim from doing horrible shit.

Like, not trying to jinx us, but I could see half the Rs wanting to deport anyone Hispanic, and the rest only wanting to deport immigrants. And they spend two years fighting over it till midterms and lose the House and/or Senate.

It's just crazy she's happy being a "chair person" in a subcommittee with 3 people total, all of which have the exact same title.

trump throws too many more chairs in there, and the ones that already have it get pissed because they're not special anymore, and the cycle starts over.

If Mitch McTurtle doesn't put the work in wrangling cats in both the House and Senate, it's going to significantly limit Trump's damage. And McTurtle only really cares about judicial picks. He ain't going to put the work in to unite House Republicans, and there's no House Republican who can do it.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago

This is another fun way they're like Nazis. We were pretty lucky because if they weren't infighting so much they might have had a chance.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

I just hope the Democrats understand this too. Their best moves are probably going to almost always be either stirring the pot to try to turn the GOP on themselves, or throwing wrenches in the governmental machinery whenever possible to keep them from doing anything meaningful.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 hours ago

Got Thune now mcturtle not doing the senate wrangling anymore. We've seen Johnson wrangle the house decently well though.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 19 hours ago

The Department of Government Efficiency needs more people then the United Nations.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Department of Transportation.

[–] answersplease77@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

you'd think the most efficient thing for the government to do is not pay her for useless roles on the expense of tax payers

Is this a position she needs to resign from the House to do, because that would be awful! /s

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It would be another hilarious bit of the White House Reality Show Sequel, if the Department of Government Efficiency board just kept growing and growing with people that wanted a cool title from Trump to feel important.

[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is how he gets rid of musk

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I can very easily see it as a staging ground for more back door fundraising/corruption, a lauch pad for future Congressmen/Governors/etc, and a way of trial ballooning propaganda before bringing it live