That's exactly what I would expect from an intersection that prioritizes safety of more vulnerable users.
this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
29 points (96.8% liked)
Solarpunk Urbanism
1835 readers
2 users here now
A community to discuss solarpunk and other new and alternative urbanisms that seek to break away from our currently ecologically destructive urbanisms.
- Henri Lefebvre, The Right to the City — In brief, the right to the city is the right to the production of a city. The labor of a worker is the source of most of the value of a commodity that is expropriated by the owner. The worker, therefore, has a right to benefit from that value denied to them. In the same way, the urban citizen produces and reproduces the city through their own daily actions. However, the the city is expropriated from the urbanite by the rich and the state. The right to the city is therefore the right to appropriate the city by and for those who make and remake it.
Checkout these related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Interesting intersection, but what about the combined sidewalk-cyclelane in the distance. Here where I live cyclist hate when the bicycle lane is next to the sidewalk, because pedestrians accidentally wander to the cycleway frequently. They prefer when the cycleway is next to the road instead.
In proper Dutch cities you have 'zebra crossings', a lot of them. This makes it unnecessary for pedestrians to casually cross cycling lines.
I think it's a matter of culture. Dutch people by and large just keep to the rules and they aren't stupid enough to just walk in front of bikes.
You're entirely right. Cyclists can't take full advantage of their bikes as long as they have to watch out for pedestrians crossing. It's equally problematic to have to be on the defensive passing every side-street.
The ideal would be to have the 3 types of traffic entirely separated. So the cycle lane is neither next to the pedestrians nor next to the cars.