this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
150 points (98.1% liked)

Ukraine

8272 readers
970 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Supposedly, an RS-26 was launched from Astrakhan and targeted at infrastructure in Dnipro.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago

you say "test" I hear "stock problems"

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Silly Russians don't even know what continents are lol.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 25 minutes ago

They misclicked the order and accidentally got INTRA Continental ones

[–] wieson@feddit.org 14 points 12 hours ago

What Russia wants us to think:

"O no, allowing Ukraine to fire atacms into Russia was to much escalation! We must back down!"

What we actually think:

"Russia ran out of missiles and has to reach deep down its soviet arsenal to fire the last thing it's got. Next, they'll fire an R7"

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 37 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Russia declares US missile base in Poland a target

uh... that would get all of NATO involved, wouldn't it?

[–] copd@lemmy.world 14 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Yes, an attack on a NATO member would immedialy invoke article 5 (which has only been done once in history - 9/11)

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 36 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Well, I'm sure the US military complex is excited to test whether they can swat these out of the sky with their expensive toys. Now they have a chance to try.

And the more Russia launches, surely that technology will improve

[–] copd@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

Why would Trump want to fight Russia? He loves russia

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 82 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (9 children)

ruzzia is running out of everything and using its last reserves.

EU and NATO need to pool together every resource to bankrupt this rotten state and drive it from Ukrainian soil. The defeat has to be so harsh that the ruzzkis won't be able to cross any border forever. Confine them to their own country, period.

[–] ThePrimitive@lemmy.world 23 points 18 hours ago

Pretty sure they did this as nuclear sabre rattling in response to the ATACMS and Storm Shadow attacks, not because of resource constraints.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 78 points 22 hours ago (13 children)

America here.....heh. We're gonna be useless come January!

Actually we might even be working against the cause. It would not surprise me to see trumps cabinet do shitty things like sending russia weapons and money.

In fact, I'm basically expecting it.

Just know that it's not ALL America. Just like 52% of us......or, I should say 52% of the 2024 voting public.

[–] johant@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 minutes ago* (last edited 1 minute ago)

He got 76,916,317 votes (49.9%) (currently, counting hasn't finished)

https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-ELECTION/RESULTS/zjpqnemxwvx/

[–] Vikthor@lemmy.world 53 points 22 hours ago (13 children)

…or, I should say 52% of the 2024 voting public.

No. I hold those who didn't vote accountable too.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 18 points 18 hours ago

Well I guess we should be giving Ukraine some ICBM's next. Or would that not be fair? :')

[–] smokeysnilas@feddit.org 17 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

So this is confirmation then that the storm shadow strike hit someone important?

[–] learningduck@programming.dev 2 points 6 hours ago

Maybe they just ran out of any other missiles.

[–] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 16 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

How do we know this is the first and not just the first successful launch?

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 20 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Afaik, ICBMs are trackibly loud. It's difficult to fire one without everyone noticing immediately

[–] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 6 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

But are failed launches trackable? My point is that this may not be the first attempt. If their missile systems are anything like everything else in their arsenal, a successful launch is a one off exception.

[–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

A failed launch, as in an initially successful launch that went wrong in the air, can afterwards be spotted even on commercial satellite images: https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/09/satellite-images-suggest-test-of-russian-super-weapon-failed-spectacularly/ The usa and nato probably know long before those amateur spotters do.

If the rocket fails to launch at all when the button is pressed, then noone will be allowed to know probably. It could be that they tried to launch 10 and only 1 ignited, or maybe there was just the one. Russia isn't going to tell the truth about anything so it's anyone's guess. If it fails to ignite, then I'd expect them to just pack up the rocket again and continue to pretend doing maintenance and have soldiers guarding the stuff.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Patch@feddit.uk 22 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

Seems like a bit of a waste to launch an intercontinental missile at a country next door, on the same continent. Isn't Russia supposed to have plenty of short and mid range ballistic missiles? I guess they must be running low.

I was under the impression that ICBMs weren't all that great for conventional warheads. Their payload capacity isn't enormous and their accuracy tends to be relatively low- which matters not a jot if you're firing nukes (which do a lot of bang per kilo, and where a few hundred metres either way isn't likely to be critical), but not so great for dropping normal munitions.

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 10 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Launching just one sounds like the primary purpose is for messaging, not taking out whatever single target. They want to remind Europeans that they aren't safe just because they live far away. The west has been getting numb to the constant threats of using nuclear weapons. I believe this launch is to give those threats more weight again.

The US will no longer be a threat to Russian ambitions come January. Expect an urgent fear campaign to get the rest of NATO to no longer want to stick their necks out for Ukraine.

[–] nexusband@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago

Nah, we're not numb. But the fact of the matter is, we can't change anything and letting him win is not going to work, because what's the alternative? Being subjugated or attacked at a later state?

Putin should not forget however, that "we", the EU, also have Nukes and will retaliate, if push comes to shove. Those threats are meaningless either way.

[–] Streetlights@lemmy.world 25 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

I suspect the use of an RS-26 was meant to serve as a provocation/response to the recent ATACMs strikes.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›