this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
47 points (96.1% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5268 readers
805 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7
47
📈 Why everyone missed solar’s exponential growth (www.exponentialview.co)
submitted 9 hours ago by humanspiral@lemmy.ca to c/climate
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The main explanation for continuous underforcasts by IEA, is that their rolodex includes only oil companies, and that's who they ask.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 4 points 3 hours ago

Paywall half way through the article

[–] paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 hours ago

I think the incredible shrinking Rolodex of politicians in general is the reason for many such gaps.

[–] silence7 9 points 9 hours ago

There's a bit more to it — people figured that the learning curve for solar would stop improving so much