this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
83 points (98.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

9645 readers
551 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Missed chance to charge pickup trucks more than smaller cars... You have made perfect sense to incentivize smaller cars.

[–] simplymath@lemmy.world 28 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Considering it was a blocked by the governor during the first attempt, I'll take this for the win that it is.

Also, given that NYC isn't as prone to the big truck phenomenon that plagues the rest of the country, that had the potential to backfire and hurt tradespeople more than rich folks with Teslas.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You have a point. But lately where I live I'm seeing more often tradespeople and delivery in tiny electric vans. I think these vehicles could have been given a special discount at least in the beginning.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

When I used to live there as a tradie, certain trades could get away with the Ford transits and stuff, plumbers electricians etc. It seemed welders, masons, tile/tub people likely can't.

But necessity is the mother of invention.

[–] simplymath@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

yeah. sometimes you just need an 8ft bed. I'd love to see the tiny Japanese trucks, but they don't meet American safety standards (for better or worse).

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I'd argue a 8ft cargo van is still better for the majoirty of trades than an 8ft bed. Maybe landscapers and oversized loads are an exception but otherwise the van is far more practical for most applications. Many vans can tow as well.

[–] simplymath@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

yeah, but the trucks exist already and vans are pretty popular due to the ability to lock one's gear inside. This is one of those cases where perfect is the enemy of good. You can't change the material conditions of working people overnight and any argument for replacing outdated vehicles relies on the production of newer things, with all the associated environmental costs.

[–] asceticism@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Japanese cars like you bought up is what I was thinking. You only really see the bigger trucks for full on construction or trash disposal. Even then they trend smaller. Shame about the safety stands.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Same, glad to see this experiment on the roll.