this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
32 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

658 readers
199 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

delivering 128TB-class storage ... Phison delivers PCIe 5.0 connectivity with 122.88TB of storage

Can I just say that I have had it up to here with this measurement "class" bullshit? Either the drive actually is 128 TB, or it isn't. Either the fridge actually is 31 cubic feet, or it isn't. Either the TV really is 60 inches, or it isn't.

Just state the actual number. Most manufacturers use the "class" designation to steadfastly refuse to be truthful, which just means we can never actually trust them.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Is a 960GB SSD in the 1TB class?

[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Isn't it because if they can't guarantee 100% of the advertised storage they'd have risk. And achieving 100% guaranteed functionality on microchips is damn near impossible cause silicon lottery

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No, because that would be an easily overcome hurdle by just adding a little extra silicon in each unit to ensure that it meets or exceeds the advertised capacity if the manufacturer were not in fact actually interested in being deliberately misleading. This thing appears to kind of be an exception, but even then they're allergic to just outright stating the capacity.

If the manufacturers were interested in being honest with these types of things the "size class" would not so often invariably, unfailingly, result in a generous rounding up of the stated figure rather than rounding down.

TV's are always smaller than their advertised "size class." Appliances are always a lesser capacity than their advertised "size class." Cameras always have fewer pixels than their "megapixel class." Storage media is always smaller capacity than its advertised "size class."

(And this is before we even get into the whole megabyte-gigabyte-terabyte/mebibyte-gigibyte-tebibyte debate.)

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

They don't want to get sued, and don't want to state the actual number which probably is unpalatable...

[–] shatteredsword@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

They did state the actual number….in the article.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Phison has not revealed the pricing of these new SSDs.

One millyun dollars

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The 122.88 vs 128 isn't the difference from TiB to TB. It's equivalent to 128 x 960GB. So it's like one of those cheap drives that takes the "overprovision reserve/lifespan extension" out of the terabyte itself